Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco

Article View: alt.cellular.attws

Article #181

Back to alt.cellular.attws Previous Next

#181

From: nospam
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:27

30 lines
2979 bytes

In article <rg5456d7isqsi0dooijrvdajtnv718lldi@4ax.com>, John Navas
<spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> >> There's no compelling public interest in good cellular coverage. 
> >
> >The cellular phone is one of the greatest safety gadgets ever invented....
> >
> >Simply the ability to call 911 in time of emergency is all that's needed to 
> >make your statement moot.
> 
> Your argument doesn't apply to a neighborhood, the subject at issue.

emergencies happen more often in neighborhoods than they do out in the
middle of nowhere where a sat phone would be the only option.

> >Obviously, you've never been broken down in the middle of nowhere on the 
> >interstate....
> 
> Cell phones aren't all that dependable.  

mine are. maybe you need a better one.

> I've been in the middle of nowhere many times with no cell signal.

stop using t-mobile :)

> If you really care about safety, then you'll carry a PLB or sat phone.
> You might as well argue for gas stations every 5 miles in rural areas.

my cellphone works everywhere i travel.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <300720100927390986%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail

References:

<hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <v4u15659qncovipl40hutg4iieihmuubtk@4ax.com> <Xns9DC429072B37noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com> <Xns9DC4CAB54717Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <rg5456d7isqsi0dooijrvdajtnv718lldi@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f9250,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gid5695fe328a,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet
Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:27:39 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <300720100927390986%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <v4u15659qncovipl40hutg4iieihmuubtk@4ax.com> <Xns9DC429072B37noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com> <Xns9DC4CAB54717Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <rg5456d7isqsi0dooijrvdajtnv718lldi@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:27:40 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="12bR4NLqpsoWmF05Y7k3wg";
 logging-data="17142"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+E/OS7QpPMcy9b6SPOcYPW"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Carbon/OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:giOs/rjgTR16+NJK2xgqWjn8qHE=

Reply to Parent Message