🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #216

Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco

#216
From: AES
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:45
18 lines
2695 bytes
In article <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com>,
 John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> This is a kinda sorta democracy, so if the majority would rather have
> less towers and poorer wireless coverage, then that's what they should
> be able to get -- there's no right of the few to impose their will on
> the many in this regard.  >>> There's no compelling public interest in
> good cellular coverage. <<<  It's up to cellular carriers (and hams)
> to sell the public on the benefits of their towers.  

Sorry -- have to flatly disagree on this one.  

Cellular phone service is a form of basic infrastructure that serves 
everyone, benefits everyone, in innumerable ways; provides benefits 
that are very hard to obtain in almost other fashion; and that just 
ought to be available to almost everyone, almost everywhere, as 
much as is reasonably feasible . . .  just like roads and highways, just
like plain old POTS once was (but isn't really any more).
Technical Details
Message-ID: <siegman-7B6EB8.08451429072010@sciid-srv02.med.tufts.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!siegman
References: <3pol161pki2f0ffvt633dt1kgoev7bioss@4ax.com> <3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <v4u15659qncovipl40hutg4iieihmuubtk@4ax.com> <Xns9DC429072B37noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f9250,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gid5695fe328a,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!siegman
From: AES <siegman@stanford.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet
Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:45:14 -0700
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <siegman-7B6EB8.08451429072010@sciid-srv02.med.tufts.edu>
References: <3pol161pki2f0ffvt633dt1kgoev7bioss@4ax.com> <3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <v4u15659qncovipl40hutg4iieihmuubtk@4ax.com> <Xns9DC429072B37noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com>
X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1280418336 14210 127.0.0.1 (29 Jul 2010 15:45:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)