Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended - Article 348 - go-pugleaf

Article View: alt.cellular.attws

Article #348

Back to alt.cellular.attws Previous Next

Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended

#348

From: nospam
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:19

14 lines
2167 bytes

In article <i1uhhl$i0c$1@speranza.aioe.org>, JC Dill
<jcdill.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> I'm told that circa 1990 you could buy a 5 watt bag phone.
> > 
> > specific model?
> 
> I never saw one in person - was just told about them.  (The reception I 
> got in the mountains with my 3 watt phone was good enough that I didn't 
> go hunting for a 5 watt model.)  Here's a reference to one:
> 
> <http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php/1201533-external-antenna>

that doesn't say much of anything. more than likely they're mistaken.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <180720101919060440%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail

References:

<Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <dbw0o.19896$lS1.7928@newsfe12.iad> <180720100149520637%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org> <180720100339265088%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1uhhl$i0c$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:19:06 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <180720101919060440%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <dbw0o.19896$lS1.7928@newsfe12.iad> <180720100149520637%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org> <180720100339265088%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1uhhl$i0c$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:19:06 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="sdwj3r/sAkX/JwCAxkeUMA";
 logging-data="4538"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jjpAlJlvcUtn25YlRyEm9"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Carbon/OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XQmaoNF8XZgkYPCbEZfJCqE2PKY=

Reply to Parent Message