Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #425Re: Consumer Reports testing confirms that the Apple "Bumpers" for the iPhone 4 solves its antenna problem
From: nospam
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:58
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:58
73 lines
4610 bytes
4610 bytes
In article <f860o.17561$0A5.16729@newsfe22.iad>, John Slade <hhitman86@pacbell.net> wrote: > > microsoft used its monopoly status to squash anything else, and that's > > why they got in a heap of trouble. > > Most of the competition was squashed because the put out > shitty products. nope. it was due to microsoft's predatory tactics and they were found guilty of it in a court of law. here's another: <http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRU00634320080227> > In other words you can't show me were "more and more" > people are switching to OS X. look at apple's sales numbers. they keep going up and up and they are outpacing the market as a whole. > >> I've been hearing this > >> same drivel for years and yet OS X market share has been between > >> 3%-5% of the worldwide base. Now if OS X reaches 20% of the > >> market, I would be shocked. > > > > depends how you count it. market share usually includes pcs that are > > not desktops, including servers, kiosks, point of sale terminals, etc. > > look at desktop market share, or retail sales, and you get an entirely > > different picture. > > > > in 2008, it was 14%: > > <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9069298/Mac_sales_corral_14_of_U. > > S._computer_market> > > I'm talking about the worldwide market and this is only > about the US market. Guess you didn't read before you posted it. i guess you didn't read where it depends how you count it, and you're ignoring that a lot of those pcs are not used on the desktop. > > for computers over $1000 (apple doesn't bother with the low end), apple > > has 91% market share: > > > > <http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/Apple-has-91-of-market-for-10 > > 00-PCs-says-NPD/1248313624> > > That 91% of computers over $1000 is a very small segment > of the market. actually it's a significant part of the market. > And those are retail sales in brick-and-mortar > stores. It's also based on revenue and not unit sales. So while > this looks good to those who don't know, it really isn't > significant as most computer sales are online. it's actually very significant. most computers sold are over $1000. the netbook market is the exception. look at amazon's best selling computers. it changes continually, but right now, apple has the #1 and #2 spots and four of the top ten. also not that a $700 mini and $1000 imac is outselling the $300 desktop and 'nettop' in 3rd and 4th places. a few weeks ago, a $2000 imac was in the top three. <http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/pc/565098/ref=pd_ts_pc_nav> over on the portables side, the #1 selling laptop is a macbook, despite it being nearly twice the price of the ones in 2nd through 5th place. also, apple has three of the top ten spots there. <http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/pc/565108/ref=pd_ts_pc_nav>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<160720101958263056%nospam@nospam.invalid>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<i1nf5g$hbq$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i1nqs6$4i8$2@news.eternal-september.org> <150720101636232021%nospam@nospam.invalid> <pgav365phrbumf3efmn6244vmlgv21bi4s@4ax.com> <i1odag$kdp$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i1ofpta0js002malch@news.sonic.net> <TU_%n.36627$Ls1.31553@newsfe11.iad> <9J%%n.37781$f_3.6150@newsfe17.iad> <Iw00o.37785$f_3.6571@newsfe17.iad> <160720101543144313%nospam@nospam.invalid> <HX40o.37793$f_3.3851@newsfe17.iad> <160720101834129776%nospam@nospam.invalid> <f860o.17561$0A5.16729@newsfe22.iad>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,b1140feb57b2493a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,b1140feb57b2493a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports testing confirms that the Apple "Bumpers" for the iPhone 4 solves its antenna problem Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:58:26 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 73 Message-ID: <160720101958263056%nospam@nospam.invalid> References: <i1nf5g$hbq$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i1nqs6$4i8$2@news.eternal-september.org> <150720101636232021%nospam@nospam.invalid> <pgav365phrbumf3efmn6244vmlgv21bi4s@4ax.com> <i1odag$kdp$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i1ofpta0js002malch@news.sonic.net> <TU_%n.36627$Ls1.31553@newsfe11.iad> <9J%%n.37781$f_3.6150@newsfe17.iad> <Iw00o.37785$f_3.6571@newsfe17.iad> <160720101543144313%nospam@nospam.invalid> <HX40o.37793$f_3.3851@newsfe17.iad> <160720101834129776%nospam@nospam.invalid> <f860o.17561$0A5.16729@newsfe22.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="sdwj3r/sAkX/JwCAxkeUMA"; logging-data="3861"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19L13FAkh4FCFxVFGEzlb+L" User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Carbon/OS X) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jeHL1JEKhXzPtvGdbBFC795zj4w=