🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #425

Re: Consumer Reports testing confirms that the Apple "Bumpers" for the iPhone 4 solves its antenna problem

#425
From: nospam
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:58
73 lines
4610 bytes
In article <f860o.17561$0A5.16729@newsfe22.iad>, John Slade
<hhitman86@pacbell.net> wrote:

> > microsoft used its monopoly status to squash anything else, and that's
> > why they got in a heap of trouble.
> 
>      Most of the competition was squashed because the put out 
> shitty products.

nope. it was due to microsoft's predatory tactics and they were found
guilty of it in a court of law.

here's another:
<http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRU00634320080227>

>       In other words you can't show me were "more and more" 
> people are switching to OS X.

look at apple's sales numbers. they keep going up and up and they are
outpacing the market as a whole. 

> >> I've been hearing this
> >> same drivel for years and yet OS X market share has been between
> >> 3%-5% of the worldwide base. Now if OS X reaches 20% of the
> >> market, I would be shocked.
> >
> > depends how you count it. market share usually includes pcs that are
> > not desktops, including servers, kiosks, point of sale terminals, etc.
> > look at desktop market share, or retail sales, and you get an entirely
> > different picture.
> >
> > in 2008, it was 14%:
> > <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9069298/Mac_sales_corral_14_of_U.
> > S._computer_market>
> 
>       I'm talking about the worldwide market and this is only 
> about the US market. Guess you didn't read before you posted it.

i guess you didn't read where it depends how you count it, and you're
ignoring that a lot of those pcs are not used on the desktop. 

> > for computers over $1000 (apple doesn't bother with the low end), apple
> > has 91% market share:
> >
> > <http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/Apple-has-91-of-market-for-10
> > 00-PCs-says-NPD/1248313624>
> 
>         That 91% of computers over $1000 is a very small segment 
> of the market. 

actually it's a significant part of the market.

> And those are retail sales in brick-and-mortar 
> stores. It's also based on revenue and not unit sales. So while 
> this looks good to those who don't know, it really isn't 
> significant as most computer sales are online.

it's actually very significant. most computers sold are over $1000. the
netbook market is the exception.

look at amazon's best selling computers. it changes continually, but
right now, apple has the #1 and #2 spots and four of the top ten. also
not that a $700 mini and $1000 imac is outselling the $300 desktop and
'nettop' in 3rd and 4th places. a few weeks ago, a $2000 imac was in
the top three.

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/pc/565098/ref=pd_ts_pc_nav>

over on the portables side, the #1 selling laptop is a macbook, despite
it being nearly twice the price of the ones in 2nd through 5th place.
also, apple has three of the top ten spots there.

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/pc/565108/ref=pd_ts_pc_nav>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <160720101958263056%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <i1nf5g$hbq$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i1nqs6$4i8$2@news.eternal-september.org> <150720101636232021%nospam@nospam.invalid> <pgav365phrbumf3efmn6244vmlgv21bi4s@4ax.com> <i1odag$kdp$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i1ofpta0js002malch@news.sonic.net> <TU_%n.36627$Ls1.31553@newsfe11.iad> <9J%%n.37781$f_3.6150@newsfe17.iad> <Iw00o.37785$f_3.6571@newsfe17.iad> <160720101543144313%nospam@nospam.invalid> <HX40o.37793$f_3.3851@newsfe17.iad> <160720101834129776%nospam@nospam.invalid> <f860o.17561$0A5.16729@newsfe22.iad>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,b1140feb57b2493a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,b1140feb57b2493a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports testing confirms that the Apple "Bumpers" for the iPhone 4 solves its antenna problem
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:58:26 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <160720101958263056%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <i1nf5g$hbq$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i1nqs6$4i8$2@news.eternal-september.org> <150720101636232021%nospam@nospam.invalid> <pgav365phrbumf3efmn6244vmlgv21bi4s@4ax.com> <i1odag$kdp$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i1ofpta0js002malch@news.sonic.net> <TU_%n.36627$Ls1.31553@newsfe11.iad> <9J%%n.37781$f_3.6150@newsfe17.iad> <Iw00o.37785$f_3.6571@newsfe17.iad> <160720101543144313%nospam@nospam.invalid> <HX40o.37793$f_3.3851@newsfe17.iad> <160720101834129776%nospam@nospam.invalid> <f860o.17561$0A5.16729@newsfe22.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:58:28 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="sdwj3r/sAkX/JwCAxkeUMA";
 logging-data="3861"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19L13FAkh4FCFxVFGEzlb+L"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Carbon/OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jeHL1JEKhXzPtvGdbBFC795zj4w=