Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #447Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: AES
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:09
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:09
14 lines
1921 bytes
1921 bytes
In article <rnss361grsdicbd06rbajlgniho8d4877o@4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote: > > Think regeneration and borderline oscillation. > 1) Thanks -- all sounds sensible. 2) "Super-regeneration" was a major technique way long ago, nicht wahr? My impression is it's no longer common, if used at all. 3) Apologies about the name (whenever I'm in Deutschland, a second 'n' gets auto-added to my name on paperwork everywhere I go).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<siegman-F52BD3.20090115072010@bmedcfsc-srv02.tufts.ad.tufts.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!usenet.stanford.edu!siegmanReferences:
<i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <yx5%n.36029$YX3.29859@newsfe18.iad> <4c3cf409$0$22110$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <h7jq369avp6khdjbc8uivaioh8miie84tn@4ax.com> <4c3dab03$0$22127$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <cmrr3650cdqpfkimtqgb45nj36vgsp3o8i@4ax.com> <siegman-5AA573.13052714072010@sciid-srv02.med.tufts.edu> <rnss361grsdicbd06rbajlgniho8d4877o@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!usenet.stanford.edu!siegman From: AES <siegman@stanford.edu> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:09:01 -0700 Organization: Stanford University Lines: 14 Message-ID: <siegman-F52BD3.20090115072010@bmedcfsc-srv02.tufts.ad.tufts.edu> References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <yx5%n.36029$YX3.29859@newsfe18.iad> <4c3cf409$0$22110$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <h7jq369avp6khdjbc8uivaioh8miie84tn@4ax.com> <4c3dab03$0$22127$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <cmrr3650cdqpfkimtqgb45nj36vgsp3o8i@4ax.com> <siegman-5AA573.13052714072010@sciid-srv02.med.tufts.edu> <rnss361grsdicbd06rbajlgniho8d4877o@4ax.com> X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1279249742 9991 127.0.0.1 (16 Jul 2010 03:09:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)