Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #514Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: Jeff Liebermann
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:32
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:32
41 lines
3355 bytes
3355 bytes
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:41:11 -0700, John Slade <hhitman86@pacbell.net> wrote: >> however, everyone is suddenly an rf engineer and thinks they have all >> the answers, even when apple themselves haven't completely figured it >> out. > > There is nothing to figure out. The antenna is in a bad >place. Ummm... I are an RF Engineer (and I'm enjoying all the speculation). I also design and model antennas in my spare time: <http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/> It's not the location of the antenna. The same antenna design located anywhere on the phone will cause the same problem. I don't think anyone has tried it but I suspect that the BlueGoof and Wi-Fi performance might also suffer when the other antenna is touched. I posted my guesses previously (high impedance antenna with excessively high Q) and am waiting for a chance to rip into the guts of an iPhone 4 to see how the antenna is really designed. The inside photos that I've seen don't show enough. Drivel: I wonder if the black silicon rubber prophylactic that Apple wraps around the phone is doped with carbon black for static reduction. That should make a nice RF attenuator and/or slightly conductive "short". 10 Things Apple Can Do to Fix iPhone 4 Antenna Woes <http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/10-Things-Apples-Can-Do-to-Fix-iPhone-4-Antenna-Woes-492275/> AppleCare: The iPhone 4 Update Won't Solve the Antenna Problem <http://gizmodo.com/5580587/applecare-the-iphone-4-update-wont-solve-the-antenna-problem> -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<emep365eq9sak4rvoql4s7tnsjp6d0e30g@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad> <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid> <sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:32:12 -0500 From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:32:11 -0700 Message-ID: <emep365eq9sak4rvoql4s7tnsjp6d0e30g@4ax.com> References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad> <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid> <sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 41 X-Trace: sv3-pVhwDacVwmbNb5xiACmRKm8vmacDkq8vqErgwN+gGkh6V608IGIgHDMoMeQnqPfhIZw4wp6N0HnU2nX!/G3GZstZT80r2C4YqMwx5gn8ef39lLy6LsJiGlpbPF+hvgR0O0GTOOUUbXQ2IOQVCymA8V9CpuKb!GcqQiw== X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40