🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #519

Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended

#519
From: nospam
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:46
76 lines
4409 bytes
In article <t_2%n.19132$4B7.18392@newsfe16.iad>, John Slade
<hhitman86@pacbell.net> wrote:

> >> However many people have implemented the patch and still have
> >> the problem. There are videos on the Internet confirming this.
> >
> > really? what videos confirm people have installed a nonexistent patch?
> 
>      Well I don't know if the patch is out yet, 

so why did you say it was?

> but that's what 
> some people have said. 

people say a lot of things

> Apple has already admitted that the patch 
> will not fix the problem.

where did they say that???

> >> The antenna is in a bad place, plain and simple.
> >
> > where else would you put it?
> 
>       On the inside, maybe on the top and bottom rather than all 
> around. I'm no antenna engineer but I would probably put it 
> where people won't touch it by normal use.

you're no antenna engineer, yet you have diagnosed the problem and have
a solution before actual antenna engineers have? how do you explain
that?

> > nokia, sanyo and samsung have warnings how to hold their phones
> > properly, probably other brands too.
> 
>     What does this have to do with Apple's problem? That's what 
> a lot of Mac freaks do, they say "Look someone else has a 
> problem!" That's a very lame argument.

actually it shows how hypocritical people are. if apple does it, it's
bad, but when someone else does it, nobody cares. why isn't it a
problem when nokia or sanyo phones tell you how to hold them properly?

> >> This allows me to figure out a couple of things. Apple rushed the
> >> iPhone 4 to market without proper testing. They rushed it to
> >> market to keep up with companies who are putting out phones that
> >> are more advanced than the iPhone. Apple didn't want to fall
> >> behind.
> >
> > nonsense.
> 
>      Apple is falling behind and losing sales on the iPhone 4 to 
> Android devices.

nope. android is gaining momentum but apple still has a much larger
market share based on recent surveys. june & july numbers are not out
yet. apple sold 2 million iphone 4s in a couple of days, versus a
couple of weeks for android to do that.

> With the multiple problems with the iPhone 4, 
> they will never catch up with The Blackberry and Android based 
> phones will overtake them in a relatively short time.

blackberry is faltering. android probably will overtake apple in unit
sales but so what? there's room for more than one player. 

nikon and canon both share the majority of camera sales. neither one is
on the verge of disappearing. 

>      It's the main factor here because they put it right where 
> people are gonna touch it. Other companies put the antenna on 
> the inside or in places that don't get touched with normal use.

but where a hand covers it. there are always tradeoffs.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <130720101246293554%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.93.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!transit4.hitnews.eu!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad> <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid> <sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad> <130720101135106850%nospam@nospam.invalid> <t_2%n.19132$4B7.18392@newsfe16.iad>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.93.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!transit4.hitnews.eu!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:46:29 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <130720101246293554%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad> <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid> <sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad> <130720101135106850%nospam@nospam.invalid> <t_2%n.19132$4B7.18392@newsfe16.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:46:31 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="12bR4NLqpsoWmF05Y7k3wg";
 logging-data="28850"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187N01Dnx9RXffb28X9Bx8o"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Carbon/OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:K5KpRgNaYAvkbUG2IguXlv6T380=