๐Ÿš€ go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #524

Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended

#524
From: John Navas
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:36
40 lines
2766 bytes
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:11:44 -0700, in
<o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann
<jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:54:04 -0700, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad>, John Slade
>><hhitman86@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>>>       Yea it's clear from Youtube videos and tests like the one 
>>> from CR that the iPhone 4 has a hardware problem when it comes 
>>> to the antenna.
>>
>>touch any phone's antenna, watch what happens.
>
>Did you actually try it?  I did with several phones that have
>projecting antennas.  LG VX8000, VX8100, and VX8300 on Verizon
>(900MHz).  Also, Motorola RAZR V3m.  I can wrap my hand around the
>antenna and get maybe a -4dB drop (about 1 bar).  A 1900Mhz PCS phone
>will probably have a larger drop.
>
>Might as well try it right now....  Going into field test mode, and
>making a call.  Rx power = -75dBm.  Wrap my hand around the antenna,
>and it drops to -78dBm (average).  Not much but enough to drop a call
>if I'm in a marginal area.  Now, compare that to the iPhone 4 drop of
>about 30dB.
>
>Try it:
><www.wpsantennas.com/pdf/testmode/FieldTestModes.pdf>

T-Mobile myTouch 3G 3.5mm Jack (aka HTC Magic, Android 1.6)
No case. Signal strength unaffected by holding it in any
way I can think of.

-- 
John

"Assumption is the mother of all screw ups."
[Wethern๏ฟฝs Law of Suspended Judgement]
Technical Details
Message-ID: <n8mp36p6tkg5ckfvu9ufnlk0vi04tlp04k@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:36:09 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <n8mp36p6tkg5ckfvu9ufnlk0vi04tlp04k@4ax.com>
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:36:16 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Z69Ylg5oWFjLftPdMfPgDA";
 logging-data="21344"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kUrq4bALN6lBb1uPCgz98"
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7iA+Dsn1Hfyj2LPrvmzcRRMbTtQ=