Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #524Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: John Navas
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:36
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:36
40 lines
2766 bytes
2766 bytes
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:11:44 -0700, in <o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote: >On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:54:04 -0700, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> >wrote: > >>In article <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad>, John Slade >><hhitman86@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >>> Yea it's clear from Youtube videos and tests like the one >>> from CR that the iPhone 4 has a hardware problem when it comes >>> to the antenna. >> >>touch any phone's antenna, watch what happens. > >Did you actually try it? I did with several phones that have >projecting antennas. LG VX8000, VX8100, and VX8300 on Verizon >(900MHz). Also, Motorola RAZR V3m. I can wrap my hand around the >antenna and get maybe a -4dB drop (about 1 bar). A 1900Mhz PCS phone >will probably have a larger drop. > >Might as well try it right now.... Going into field test mode, and >making a call. Rx power = -75dBm. Wrap my hand around the antenna, >and it drops to -78dBm (average). Not much but enough to drop a call >if I'm in a marginal area. Now, compare that to the iPhone 4 drop of >about 30dB. > >Try it: ><www.wpsantennas.com/pdf/testmode/FieldTestModes.pdf> T-Mobile myTouch 3G 3.5mm Jack (aka HTC Magic, Android 1.6) No case. Signal strength unaffected by holding it in any way I can think of. -- John "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups." [Wethern๏ฟฝs Law of Suspended Judgement]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<n8mp36p6tkg5ckfvu9ufnlk0vi04tlp04k@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:36:09 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <n8mp36p6tkg5ckfvu9ufnlk0vi04tlp04k@4ax.com> References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Z69Ylg5oWFjLftPdMfPgDA"; logging-data="21344"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kUrq4bALN6lBb1uPCgz98" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 Cancel-Lock: sha1:7iA+Dsn1Hfyj2LPrvmzcRRMbTtQ=