Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #550Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: Larry
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:03
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:03
33 lines
2550 bytes
2550 bytes
Ted Nelson <ted@rnelson.org> wrote in news:4c3d1178$0$1325$815e3792 @news.qwest.net: > why would there need to be a recall? there is no safety issue, it still > has the best reception of any smartphone, so it's primarily a software > glitch. > > A defective phone can kill you or your family if it COULD work where the car accident happened but it DOESN'T work because the goddamned company wanted to deny it was defective...... You tell your little denialist bullshit to the crying plaintiff mother suing their asses over it in front of the crying jurors because her 2 kids died from the fucking shitphone 4 NOT making that 911 call. I'm sure the jury will just give Jobs a fanboi ovation on their way into the deliberation room to figure out how many millions to give her and her attorney for each kid that died.... It doesn't matter how much you love Apple or what the law is. If she can convince those 12 people sitting in that jury box her kids would still be alive if the goddamned shitphone 4 had made that call....that jury doesn't give a shit about Apple computer or its Philadelphia Law Firm or its amazing reality distortion field. They'll be making that stupid decision NOT to recall this defective piece of shit and replace it with a properly designed one VERY expensive for Apple and its investors for YEARS to come.... -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xns9DB4A20F8CE8Enoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!KNOLOGY.NET-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mailReferences:
<i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com> <r03%n.19147$4B7.8699@newsfe16.iad> <4c3d1178$0$1325$815e3792@news.qwest.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!KNOLOGY.NET-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended From: Larry <noone@home.com> References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com> <r03%n.19147$4B7.8699@newsfe16.iad> <4c3d1178$0$1325$815e3792@news.qwest.net> Organization: Your Company Message-ID: <Xns9DB4A20F8CE8Enoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:03:32 +0000 Lines: 34 X-Trace: 86ec14c3d3714bd73b3df10274