🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #550

Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended

#550
From: Larry
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:03
33 lines
2550 bytes
Ted Nelson <ted@rnelson.org> wrote in news:4c3d1178$0$1325$815e3792
@news.qwest.net:

> why would there need to be a recall? there is no safety issue, it still 
> has the best reception of any smartphone, so it's primarily a software 
> glitch.
> 
> 

A defective phone can kill you or your family if it COULD work where the 
car accident happened but it DOESN'T work because the goddamned company 
wanted to deny it was defective......

You tell your little denialist bullshit to the crying plaintiff mother 
suing their asses over it in front of the crying jurors because her 2 kids 
died from the fucking shitphone 4 NOT making that 911 call.  I'm sure the 
jury will just give Jobs a fanboi ovation on their way into the 
deliberation room to figure out how many millions to give her and her 
attorney for each kid that died....

It doesn't matter how much you love Apple or what the law is.  If she can 
convince those 12 people sitting in that jury box her kids would still be 
alive if the goddamned shitphone 4 had made that call....that jury doesn't 
give a shit about Apple computer or its Philadelphia Law Firm or its 
amazing reality distortion field.  They'll be making that stupid decision 
NOT to recall this defective piece of shit and replace it with a properly 
designed one VERY expensive for Apple and its investors for YEARS to 
come....

-- 
iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships.

Larry
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Xns9DB4A20F8CE8Enoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!KNOLOGY.NET-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com> <r03%n.19147$4B7.8699@newsfe16.iad> <4c3d1178$0$1325$815e3792@news.qwest.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!KNOLOGY.NET-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: Larry <noone@home.com>
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com> <r03%n.19147$4B7.8699@newsfe16.iad> <4c3d1178$0$1325$815e3792@news.qwest.net>
Organization: Your Company
Message-ID: <Xns9DB4A20F8CE8Enoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:03:32 +0000
Lines: 34
X-Trace: 86ec14c3d3714bd73b3df10274