Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #629Re: ATT MicroCell - relocated/working
From: Boris
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:30
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:30
79 lines
5064 bytes
5064 bytes
Boris <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in news:Xns9D919057D2A26blahblahcom@81.169.183.62: > malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar) wrote in > news:htvj8m824i002malch@news.sonic.net: > >> In article <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210>, Boris >> <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>I set up the microcell. It took 5 hours for the GPS to go solid, and >>>another hour for the 3G light to go solid. The microcell is >>>positioned near a window, upstairs. While upstairs, I get between 4 >>>and 5 bars, and when I go downstairs I get between 3 and 4 bars. >> >> I get 4 or 5 bars all over my house except for one dead spot >> (a large oven and fridge are between the Microcell and that >> spot so I assume all of the metal blocks that signal). >> >>>I wonder if my cell phone is first connecting with the microcell >>>signal, but then wants to hand the call off to the outside (weaker) >>>signal, and it gets dropped during the handoff, and not because the >>>outside signal is weaker. >>> >>>I have read, and the ATT rep did tell me, that hand offs get dropped. >> >> Yes, handoffs suck. And my phone does (rarely) connect to a >> regular tower although it's on the Microcell 98% of the time. >> >>>Wonder if I should try a different placement of the microcell. >> >> It's certainly worth a try. With all low power RF setups, minor >> changes to the position and orientation of the antenna can make >> a huge difference. >> >> Sorry it hasn't worked out better for you so far. >> > > Good news. > > I looked for the next most convenient spot to locate the microcell, > somewhere that didn't require me to run any ethernet wiring from my > router, yet place near a window. I have a wired pc in the garage, but > about 10-15' from any garage windows. This hookup was a little > different in that the first time I connected the microcell directly to > my router, but this time, because the microcell would be 'sharing' an > ethernet LAN connection with a pc, I removed the ethernet cable from > the pc, plugged it into the microcell, and then used another ethernet > cable to connect the microcell to the pc. (Are the microcell and the > pc are using the same ip that's handed out by my router? Is there a > switch in the microcell?) > > The garage is at street level, and the rest of the house is one level > up. > > The gps came up solid right away, no hunting. Actually, once it > established gps connection the first day, it never hunted again > whenever I'd reboot (to get 3G going). > > The internet connection came up solid right away, and dropped a few > times, but stayed solid within minutes. > > > The 3G signal took about 15 minutes. > > While away from home, I used my att cell phone and called in to > family's att cell phones to check the microcell home connection, and > all stayed connected. I had family move about the house, especially > where connections had dropped the week before using the microcell, and > this time the connections held. > > The garage is at street level, and the rest of the house is one level > up. The microcell, so far, works well under the devices it needs to > reach. When the microcell was on the same floor, it wouldn't hold a > connection. > > I would like to place the microcell somewhere other than the garage, > but for now, I seem to have a place that works. Well, it didn't work for long. Keeps dropping calls. Works better without it. Going back.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xns9D9ED09BA60F2nospamnospaminvalid@81.169.183.62>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.78.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hth5ocu0mq002malch@news.sonic.net> <4bfca37c$0$1605$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <htjsq52m2j8002malch@news.sonic.net> <htku0c$78q$1@blue.rahul.net> <db1tv51rv5lv9kmnde9i9h8e5uuh6ctv9b@4ax.com> <htm9brbe296002malch@news.sonic.net> <Xns9D8596BA6A40blahblahcom@85.214.73.210> <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210> <htvj8m824i002malch@news.sonic.net> <Xns9D919057D2A26blahblahcom@81.169.183.62>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fa874,29bea3e9c8441fc7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.78.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Boris <nospam@nospam.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: ATT MicroCell - relocated/working Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Organization: This space for rent Lines: 79 Message-ID: <Xns9D9ED09BA60F2nospamnospaminvalid@81.169.183.62> References: <Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hth5ocu0mq002malch@news.sonic.net> <4bfca37c$0$1605$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <htjsq52m2j8002malch@news.sonic.net> <htku0c$78q$1@blue.rahul.net> <db1tv51rv5lv9kmnde9i9h8e5uuh6ctv9b@4ax.com> <htm9brbe296002malch@news.sonic.net> <Xns9D8596BA6A40blahblahcom@85.214.73.210> <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210> <htvj8m824i002malch@news.sonic.net> <Xns9D919057D2A26blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="xZH2Huq9UKBt4B1wT4bVpA"; logging-data="5192"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Pq4N1PuoL+oIvQhkA0iyu" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100621-1, 06/21/2010), Outbound message Cancel-Lock: sha1:dkJ+sSdG2NIhAMuE/psB4VJL0UQ=