🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #648

Re: ATT MicroCell

#648
From: Malcolm Hoar
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:59
34 lines
2812 bytes
In article <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210>, Boris <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>I set up the microcell.  It took 5 hours for the GPS to go solid, and 
>another hour for the 3G light to go solid.  The microcell is positioned 
>near a window, upstairs.  While upstairs, I get between 4 and 5 bars, and 
>when I go downstairs I get between 3 and 4 bars.

I get 4 or 5 bars all over my house except for one dead spot
(a large oven and fridge are between the Microcell and that
spot so I assume all of the metal blocks that signal).

>I wonder if my cell phone is first connecting with the microcell signal, 
>but then wants to hand the call off to the outside (weaker) signal, and 
>it gets dropped during the handoff, and not because the outside signal is 
>weaker.
>
>I have read, and the ATT rep did tell me, that hand offs get dropped.

Yes, handoffs suck. And my phone does (rarely) connect to a
regular tower although it's on the Microcell 98% of the time.

>Wonder if I should try a different placement of the microcell.

It's certainly worth a try. With all low power RF setups, minor
changes to the position and orientation of the antenna can make
a huge difference.

Sorry it hasn't worked out better for you so far.

-- 
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
| Malcolm Hoar           "The more I practice, the luckier I get". |
| malch@malch.com                                     Gary Player. |
| http://www.malch.com/               Shpx gur PQN.                |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID: <htvj8m824i002malch@news.sonic.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail
References: <Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hth5ocu0mq002malch@news.sonic.net> <4bfca37c$0$1605$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <htjsq52m2j8002malch@news.sonic.net> <htku0c$78q$1@blue.rahul.net> <db1tv51rv5lv9kmnde9i9h8e5uuh6ctv9b@4ax.com> <htm9brbe296002malch@news.sonic.net> <Xns9D8596BA6A40blahblahcom@85.214.73.210> <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,29bea3e9c8441fc7
X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
From: malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar)
Subject: Re: ATT MicroCell
Organization: Mine
Message-ID: <htvj8m824i002malch@news.sonic.net>
References: <Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hth5ocu0mq002malch@news.sonic.net> <4bfca37c$0$1605$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <htjsq52m2j8002malch@news.sonic.net> <htku0c$78q$1@blue.rahul.net> <db1tv51rv5lv9kmnde9i9h8e5uuh6ctv9b@4ax.com> <htm9brbe296002malch@news.sonic.net> <Xns9D8596BA6A40blahblahcom@85.214.73.210> <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210>
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 3.20
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:59:50 GMT
Lines: 34
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 May 2010 05:59:52 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: e24cadb6.news.sonic.net
X-Trace: DXC=N@GGi]5GFo9ZOaX>R?laK0m4K\QM1CV^01OYf0H`?;X1_Xd=ahISgi5>TK9VkNdA>7\5]2Ec]B14;A0K:ghe7Ro=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net