Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #648Re: ATT MicroCell
From: Malcolm Hoar
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:59
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:59
34 lines
2812 bytes
2812 bytes
In article <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210>, Boris <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >I set up the microcell. It took 5 hours for the GPS to go solid, and >another hour for the 3G light to go solid. The microcell is positioned >near a window, upstairs. While upstairs, I get between 4 and 5 bars, and >when I go downstairs I get between 3 and 4 bars. I get 4 or 5 bars all over my house except for one dead spot (a large oven and fridge are between the Microcell and that spot so I assume all of the metal blocks that signal). >I wonder if my cell phone is first connecting with the microcell signal, >but then wants to hand the call off to the outside (weaker) signal, and >it gets dropped during the handoff, and not because the outside signal is >weaker. > >I have read, and the ATT rep did tell me, that hand offs get dropped. Yes, handoffs suck. And my phone does (rarely) connect to a regular tower although it's on the Microcell 98% of the time. >Wonder if I should try a different placement of the microcell. It's certainly worth a try. With all low power RF setups, minor changes to the position and orientation of the antenna can make a huge difference. Sorry it hasn't worked out better for you so far. -- |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| | Malcolm Hoar "The more I practice, the luckier I get". | | malch@malch.com Gary Player. | | http://www.malch.com/ Shpx gur PQN. | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<htvj8m824i002malch@news.sonic.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hth5ocu0mq002malch@news.sonic.net> <4bfca37c$0$1605$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <htjsq52m2j8002malch@news.sonic.net> <htku0c$78q$1@blue.rahul.net> <db1tv51rv5lv9kmnde9i9h8e5uuh6ctv9b@4ax.com> <htm9brbe296002malch@news.sonic.net> <Xns9D8596BA6A40blahblahcom@85.214.73.210> <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,29bea3e9c8441fc7 X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet From: malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar) Subject: Re: ATT MicroCell Organization: Mine Message-ID: <htvj8m824i002malch@news.sonic.net> References: <Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hth5ocu0mq002malch@news.sonic.net> <4bfca37c$0$1605$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <htjsq52m2j8002malch@news.sonic.net> <htku0c$78q$1@blue.rahul.net> <db1tv51rv5lv9kmnde9i9h8e5uuh6ctv9b@4ax.com> <htm9brbe296002malch@news.sonic.net> <Xns9D8596BA6A40blahblahcom@85.214.73.210> <Xns9D88B2EAE9646nospamnospaminvalid@85.214.73.210> X-Newsreader: News Xpress 3.20 Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:59:50 GMT Lines: 34 NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 May 2010 05:59:52 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: e24cadb6.news.sonic.net X-Trace: DXC=N@GGi]5GFo9ZOaX>R?laK0m4K\QM1CV^01OYf0H`?;X1_Xd=ahISgi5>TK9VkNdA>7\5]2Ec]B14;A0K:ghe7Ro= X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net