Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #703Re: ATT MicroCell
From: Boris
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:03
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:03
47 lines
2730 bytes
2730 bytes
Dane Jasper <dane@sonic.net> wrote in news:4bfc0d13$0$1643$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net: > In ba.internet Boris <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >> 1) If I have lousy GPS signals at my house, how will this thing >> connect for E911 registration/location during setup? Could be out of >> luck? > > I've had to keep mine on the window-sill to maintain a signal. The > GPS is used for timekeeping, and also to validate that it's in an area > where AT&T can use the frequency. > >> 2) Once GPS connection is made, I understand I can then move the unit >> to another room in the house, and GPS is no longer needed. Yes? > > No, apparently not. > >> 3) Registering my family ATT account members authorizes the >> Microcell to hand incoming calls over to their cell phones, and to >> hand over any outgoing call signals they make to the Microcell. Yes? > > Yes. > >> 4) I can register other (up to 10) ATTWS users for use when they are >> in my home? > > Yes. > >> 5) I assume that when anyone calls from outside (1 mile away or 2000 >> miles away, and from ANY? carrier), to any registered Microcell user >> that it senses is within range of the Microcell, the ATTWS knows to >> route that incoming call to the internet, so that it can reach the >> Microcell. Is this correct? > > Well, only for AT&T 3G phones that are registered with the device. > Dane, you're not saying that outside callers have to be authorized microcell users? If a Verison user calls, will the call be routed through the internet to the microcell, to an authorized ATTWS (3G phone) microcell user? If yes, does the Verizon caller have to be 3G, or is the 3G requirement only on the authorized users end? Thanks, Dane
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xns9D83708E8D9E6blahblahcom@188.40.43.245>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <4bfc0d13$0$1643$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,29bea3e9c8441fc7 X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Boris <nospam@nospam.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: ATT MicroCell Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Your Company Lines: 47 Message-ID: <Xns9D83708E8D9E6blahblahcom@188.40.43.245> References: <Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <4bfc0d13$0$1643$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> Injection-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="gjWuc7Ed/hlCRPDnXv1+CQ"; logging-data="15419"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yykMQAItJ63vcSJR5mPnb" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Cancel-Lock: sha1:LFpSm3iEqZw5omG3qgpD3Iltl0U=