🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #714

Re: ATT MicroCell

#714
From: Malcolm Hoar
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:24
45 lines
2963 bytes
In article <higgy-912EE7.16281525052010@news.announcetech.com>, John Higdon <higgy@kome.com> wrote:

>And my further understanding is that ANYONE within range of the 
>microcell can use it as well. 

No, it's only available to numbers that you, as owner of
the Microcell, authorize.

>So...not only do you pay to improve AT&T's 
>miserable coverage for YOU (by paying them and also providing the 
>bandwidth), but for anyone else who happens by. 

Yeah, kind of. But let's face it, if you're an AT&T subscriber
you pay a share of the cost of their infrastructure anyway.
With a Microcell, you pay a small premium, and you get a say
in exactly how that additional infrastructure is deployed.

It's not exactly the greatest thing since sliced bread. But
it works for me because:

1. I am an AT&T subscriber that is generally reasonably happy
   with their service. The coverage is mainly decent, the rates
   are competitive, and I like the rollover minutes.

2. There's a specific problem with reception at my home location.
   Verizon and Sprint are just as bad. T-Mobile is okay but
   their coverage elsewhere is not as good and they don't offer
   rollover minutes.

3. For the first time in 5 years I have decent cell coverage
   at home for a one-time cost of $150. That's not great but
   it does represent an improvement for me.

For anyone that isn't basically in the same situation the
Microcell is completely irrelevant, in my view.

Of course, I still think AT&T, and the cellular industry as
a whole, pretty much suck. We have no disagreement there.

-- 
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
| Malcolm Hoar           "The more I practice, the luckier I get". |
| malch@malch.com                                     Gary Player. |
| http://www.malch.com/               Shpx gur PQN.                |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID: <hti0op1bm262002malch@news.sonic.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail
References: <Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hthldr$ad9$1@blue.rahul.net> <higgy-912EE7.16281525052010@news.announcetech.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,29bea3e9c8441fc7
X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
From: malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar)
Subject: Re: ATT MicroCell
Organization: Mine
Message-ID: <hti0op1bm262002malch@news.sonic.net>
References: <Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hthldr$ad9$1@blue.rahul.net> <higgy-912EE7.16281525052010@news.announcetech.com>
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 3.20
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:24:25 GMT
Lines: 45
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 2010 02:24:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 684f3b7f.news.sonic.net
X-Trace: DXC=nTkO9AbQ92n<a@f4KeP<cfm4K\QM1CV^`1OYf0H`?;XajH@`G:9cP]`>TK9VkNdA>g:m>:dPZbJijmSOgLjd;L7n
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net