Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #714Re: ATT MicroCell
From: Malcolm Hoar
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:24
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:24
45 lines
2963 bytes
2963 bytes
In article <higgy-912EE7.16281525052010@news.announcetech.com>, John Higdon <higgy@kome.com> wrote: >And my further understanding is that ANYONE within range of the >microcell can use it as well. No, it's only available to numbers that you, as owner of the Microcell, authorize. >So...not only do you pay to improve AT&T's >miserable coverage for YOU (by paying them and also providing the >bandwidth), but for anyone else who happens by. Yeah, kind of. But let's face it, if you're an AT&T subscriber you pay a share of the cost of their infrastructure anyway. With a Microcell, you pay a small premium, and you get a say in exactly how that additional infrastructure is deployed. It's not exactly the greatest thing since sliced bread. But it works for me because: 1. I am an AT&T subscriber that is generally reasonably happy with their service. The coverage is mainly decent, the rates are competitive, and I like the rollover minutes. 2. There's a specific problem with reception at my home location. Verizon and Sprint are just as bad. T-Mobile is okay but their coverage elsewhere is not as good and they don't offer rollover minutes. 3. For the first time in 5 years I have decent cell coverage at home for a one-time cost of $150. That's not great but it does represent an improvement for me. For anyone that isn't basically in the same situation the Microcell is completely irrelevant, in my view. Of course, I still think AT&T, and the cellular industry as a whole, pretty much suck. We have no disagreement there. -- |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| | Malcolm Hoar "The more I practice, the luckier I get". | | malch@malch.com Gary Player. | | http://www.malch.com/ Shpx gur PQN. | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<hti0op1bm262002malch@news.sonic.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hthldr$ad9$1@blue.rahul.net> <higgy-912EE7.16281525052010@news.announcetech.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,29bea3e9c8441fc7 X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet From: malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar) Subject: Re: ATT MicroCell Organization: Mine Message-ID: <hti0op1bm262002malch@news.sonic.net> References: <Xns9D82742D7AE09blahblahcom@81.169.183.62> <hthldr$ad9$1@blue.rahul.net> <higgy-912EE7.16281525052010@news.announcetech.com> X-Newsreader: News Xpress 3.20 Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:24:25 GMT Lines: 45 NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 2010 02:24:27 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 684f3b7f.news.sonic.net X-Trace: DXC=nTkO9AbQ92n<a@f4KeP<cfm4K\QM1CV^`1OYf0H`?;XajH@`G:9cP]`>TK9VkNdA>g:m>:dPZbJijmSOgLjd;L7n X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net