Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #74Re: Verizon Coverage in Lafayatte, CA?
From: P Howard
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:23
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:23
101 lines
5217 bytes
5217 bytes
Very untrue statement. Don't take my word for it, pick up a coverage map for both companies when you are in cali next... Verizon has nearly 3 times as much coverage. -- Verizon customer/ formerly Cingular user/ formerly Sprint PCS user hoebow435@hotmail.com (al sams) wrote in article <vds33cdv9i2p53@corp.supernews.com>: > Don't get verizon they suck ass. > Get Nextel they work alot better in CA > > > > > > > "Steven M. Scharf" <scharf.steven@linkearth.net> wrote in article > <3RnDa.33750$Io.2914371@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>: > > Thanks. > > > > I'll go out there this weekend and check it out. Certainly paying the > > $150-175 termination fee to AT&T Wireless will be cheaper than > > moving. > > > > The funniest part is that she has to drive about four blocks towards > > downtown to get coverage and there are other people doing the > > same thing, sitting in their cars to make calls that they can't make at > > home. > > > > Reminds me of the Steve Wozniak GSM problem. He moved out of > > his multi-million dollar house in the Los Gatos Hills because there was > > no GSM coverage. See: http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,57594,00.html > > > > "Gumbie" <aknon@mail.com> wrote in message > > news:2b47c607.0306040426.40e267aa@posting.google.com... > > > Funny you should ask. I just went back and visited Lafayette for the > > > first time in almost 30 years and as I was driving on the frontage > > > road just over the hill from Acalanes HS I noticed a really big > > > cellular tower that was perfectly placed for downtown and Acalanes HS > > > area. As I was traveling around to all the old haunts I had no > > > problem with reception on Verizon. > > > > > > I would be very surprised if there wasn't great coverage in Lafayette, > > > given its socio-economic status. Lafayette seems only a little behind > > > Orinda in terms of wealth and power. My assumption is that when those > > > folks have problems with there cell phone, Verizon makes sure those > > > problems don't go unaddressed. The only reason I would think that > > > cellular coverage could be spotty is NIMBY (not in my back yard) in > > > terms of placement of cellular towers. But the tower I saw was big > > > and ugly and placed right on a hillside overlooking the frontage road > > > and freeway. Of course, there could have been a backlash to that. In > > > the end, I would be surprised if anywhere in that part of Contra Costa > > > County didn't have decent cellular coverage. I wouldn't even consider > > > Moraga to be so isolated. Maybe if she moved down the road to Canyon > > > it might be a problem. > > > > > > Gumby > > > > > > > > > "Steven M. Scharf" <scharf.steven@linkearth.net> wrote in message > > news:<4AfDa.33328$Io.2862101@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... > > > > My sister-in-law just moved from Moraga to Lafayette. She no longer has > > AT&T > > > > TDMA coverage in her house. She had good AT&T coverage in her condo in > > > > Moraga, which is ironic since Moraga is much more isolated. > > > > > > > > She is going to have to move if she cannot get coverage in her area. > > She's > > > > now renting > > > > so it's not a big deal to move; her job requires her to be reachable. > > > > > > > > Anyone have Verizon in Lafayette, especially by Acalanes High School? > > I'm > > > > going to > > > > have to go out there with my phone to check coverage, but I thought that > > I'd > > > > get an > > > > idea of the coverage first. > > > > > > > > What about AMPS coverage out there? Her Nokia TDMA handset is AMPS > > capable > > > > but doesn't let you force it to AMPS. Also, isn't AMPS going to incur > > > > roaming > > > > on AT&T since Verizon operates the AMPS network? > > > > > > > > She'd even go to GSM if it were any better, but I can't imagine this > > being > > > > the case > > > > given Cingular's horrible reputation in this area. > > > > > > > > > [posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups] [posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<vds7868anu6m0f@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4AfDa.33328$Io.2862101@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <2b47c607.0306040426.40e267aa@posting.google.com> <3RnDa.33750$Io.2914371@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <vds33cdv9i2p53@corp.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106595,796709f38284f8e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid106595,public X-Google-Thread: 1054d3,796709f38284f8e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1054d3,public X-Google-Thread: 110038,796709f38284f8e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid110038,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-04 09:23:34 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: thrillme5@aol.com (P Howard) Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.verizon,ba.consumers Subject: Re: Verizon Coverage in Lafayatte, CA? Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:23:34 -0000 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <vds7868anu6m0f@corp.supernews.com> References: <4AfDa.33328$Io.2862101@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <2b47c607.0306040426.40e267aa@posting.google.com> <3RnDa.33750$Io.2914371@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <vds33cdv9i2p53@corp.supernews.com> X-PhoneScoop-Post-ID: 30158 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 101