Re: RIM's troubles not over!

Article View: alt.cellular.cingular

Article #12

Back to alt.cellular.cingular Previous Next

#12

From: Rico
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 19:10

29 lines
2769 bytes

In article <58q6g.25691$Fs1.11021@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
>In <9h86g.27768$iB2.5506@bignews4.bellsouth.net> on Wed, 03 May 2006 20:24:45
>GMT, rico_001@hotmail.com (Rico) wrote:
>
>>In article <t756g.21969$Fs1.21112@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, John
> Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>VISTO WINS MOBILE EMAIL VERDICT AGAINST SEVEN NETWORKS,
>>>FILES ACTION AGAINST RESEARCH IN MOTION (RIM)
>>><http://www.visto.com/news/releases/06_05_01_seven.html>
>>>[SNIP]
>
>>I read somewhere (boy is that a good source) that vs RIM the Visto claims 
>>maybe a bit more tenuous. Of course time and a trail will tell us how valid 
>>that observation is.
>
>That the patents have been upheld in court would seem to put Visto in a very
>strong position, since the most common defense against patent infringement is
>to claim that the patents are invalid.  RIM would thus seem to be left with
>the usually harder argument that it's not actually infringing the patents.
>

Again from vague source, I think the arguement is that the technology RIM 
is employing is not exactly a match here. Not a case of the patents are 
invalid, but aren't being infringed here. Again Visto has a different 
opinion.

fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Rhs6g.30578$iB2.596@bignews4.bellsouth.net>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.28.186.75.MISMATCH!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!bigfeed.bellsouth.net!bignumber.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!bignews4.bellsouth.net.POSTED!af354d3e!not-for-mail

References:

<t756g.21969$Fs1.21112@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <9h86g.27768$iB2.5506@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <58q6g.25691$Fs1.11021@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f9250,f7c854aa3806b9e0
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,f7c854aa3806b9e0
X-Google-Thread: fa874,f7c854aa3806b9e0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9250,gid104fd2,gidfa874,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.28.186.75.MISMATCH!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!bigfeed.bellsouth.net!bignumber.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!bignews4.bellsouth.net.POSTED!af354d3e!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet
From: rico_001@hotmail.com (Rico)
Subject: Re: RIM's troubles not over!
Organization: Well
References: <t756g.21969$Fs1.21112@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <9h86g.27768$iB2.5506@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <58q6g.25691$Fs1.11021@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <Rhs6g.30578$iB2.596@bignews4.bellsouth.net>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bellsouth.net
X-Abuse-Info: Please forward a copy of all headers for proper handling
X-Trace: npbhgpngjbkmjfegdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcboipapkjpdbifdmcefmnlelhopainalnaghmncaabhgbipnlhjleihdjimhnjkbkcgpjogimejokdcbfpcfabbnfgpcbbdlchhjmfnnhjhhkgcnkjb
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 15:07:29 EDT
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 19:10:50 GMT

Reply to Parent Message