🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <t756g.21969$Fs1.21112@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>VISTO WINS MOBILE EMAIL VERDICT AGAINST SEVEN NETWORKS,
>FILES ACTION AGAINST RESEARCH IN MOTION (RIM)
><http://www.visto.com/news/releases/06_05_01_seven.html>
>
>   A jury has overwhelmingly found in favor of Visto Corporation in a 
>   long-running intellectual property lawsuit between Visto and Seven 
>   Networks. The jury found that Seven�s mobile email service infringes 
>   on the system that Visto created over the past decade. They further 
>   found this infringement to be willful on all claims brought to trial.
>
>   Immediately following their victory over Seven Networks, Visto 
>   attorneys filed a similar suit against BlackBerry provider Research 
>   in Motion (RIM). Visto is seeking an injunction and monetary damages 
>   against RIM.
>
>   "Friday�s sweeping decision against Seven Networks validates our 
>   claims that Visto�s intellectual property serves as the basis for 
>   this industry�s birth," said Brian Bogosian, Visto�s Chairman, 
>   President and CEO. "There was no ambiguity in the jury�s decision. 
>   Likewise we believe that RIM�s infringement of Visto�s technology 
>   will be halted. Our case against RIM is based on similar technology, 
>   law and patents as the case we have just won in federal court against 
>   Seven Networks."
>
>   "Based on Visto�s sweeping victory in court against Seven Networks on 
>   Friday, RIM must understand that there is no place in the mobile 
>   email space for this sort of behavior," continued Bogosian. "Under 
>   the law, which protects consumers from products that contain 
>   infringing technology, RIM should not be able to sell the BlackBerry 
>   system." 
>

I read somewhere (boy is that a good source) that vs RIM the Visto claims 
maybe a bit more tenuous. Of course time and a trail will tell us how valid 
that observation is.

fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.