🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.ericsson
Article #165

Re: SE vs NOKIA

#165
From: Richard Colton
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17
49 lines
3360 bytes
"a_dude" <blax@blox.com> wrote in message
news:c2seg6$13v6$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
> what crap...just cuz monkeys buy brand names cuz they dont know any
> different....

Err.... yeah... and your actual point is?  Or are you just trolling?

>
> all my mates are green with envy and they have sony, ericsons and all the
> other crap phones...

Yeah, if you say so Mr Troll.

>
> they see what my nokia does and cry...

With laughter.

Unlike yourself, I can see the up and downside to Nokias and Ericssons.  The
Nokias (generally) feel cheap and plasticky and have to rely on such
gimmicks as X-Press on covers and FM radios.  Ericssons on the other hand
are solidly built, reliable and have worthwhile features such as BlueTooth
that actually work without having to upgrade the firmware every other week
and sacrificing virgins to the Nokia CEO.

>
> and yes people love getting ripped off cuz they dont know whats
> new.....after all stupid monkeys DO listen to the phone salesmen instead
of
> researching for themselves...

About the only thing in your post that makes any sense, and that I can agree
with.  I did my research, and that's exactly why I bought Ericsson - because
at the end of the day Nokia only make one decent handset (6310i).  If you
want a toy, by all means buy Nokia.  If youwant a phone then you'll have to
look elsewhere.  Ericsson or Samsung are usually a better bet.

>
> btw the sony screens are so crap, id use em as a toilet accessory...

Yeah, yeah.  Go back to wanking over strip poker on your 3510i then, the
rest of us will enjoy the far superior screens fitted to the latest SE
offerings.

-- 
>>>    Unlock Your Phone's Potential  <<<
>>> http://www.thephonelocker.co.uk <<<
>>>    http://www.uselessinfo.org.uk    <<<
Technical Details
Message-ID: <hEj4c.14810$x16.311440554@news-text.cableinet.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!proxad.net!proxad.net!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!news-fe1!news-text.cableinet.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <40517d79$0$31903$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <c2seg6$13v6$1@otis.netspace.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ae63,dbdef50ae794473e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ae63,public
X-Google-Thread: f461e,dbdef50ae794473e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf461e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f383,dbdef50ae794473e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f383,public
X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,dbdef50ae794473e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public
X-Google-Thread: fb718,dbdef50ae794473e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb718,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-12 06:17:50 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!proxad.net!proxad.net!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!news-fe1!news-text.cableinet.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Richard Colton" <webmaster@NOSPAMuselessinfo.org.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.ericsson,alt.cellular.gsm,alt.cellular.nokia,aus.comms.mobile,uk.telecom.mobile
References: <40517d79$0$31903$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <c2seg6$13v6$1@otis.netspace.net.au>
Subject: Re: SE vs NOKIA
Lines: 51
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <hEj4c.14810$x16.311440554@news-text.cableinet.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:49 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.38.152.2
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueyonder.co.uk
X-Trace: news-text.cableinet.net 1079101069 82.38.152.2 (Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:49 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:49 GMT
Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)