Article View: alt.cellular.ericsson
Article #165Re: SE vs NOKIA
From: Richard Colton
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17
49 lines
3360 bytes
3360 bytes
"a_dude" <blax@blox.com> wrote in message news:c2seg6$13v6$1@otis.netspace.net.au... > what crap...just cuz monkeys buy brand names cuz they dont know any > different.... Err.... yeah... and your actual point is? Or are you just trolling? > > all my mates are green with envy and they have sony, ericsons and all the > other crap phones... Yeah, if you say so Mr Troll. > > they see what my nokia does and cry... With laughter. Unlike yourself, I can see the up and downside to Nokias and Ericssons. The Nokias (generally) feel cheap and plasticky and have to rely on such gimmicks as X-Press on covers and FM radios. Ericssons on the other hand are solidly built, reliable and have worthwhile features such as BlueTooth that actually work without having to upgrade the firmware every other week and sacrificing virgins to the Nokia CEO. > > and yes people love getting ripped off cuz they dont know whats > new.....after all stupid monkeys DO listen to the phone salesmen instead of > researching for themselves... About the only thing in your post that makes any sense, and that I can agree with. I did my research, and that's exactly why I bought Ericsson - because at the end of the day Nokia only make one decent handset (6310i). If you want a toy, by all means buy Nokia. If youwant a phone then you'll have to look elsewhere. Ericsson or Samsung are usually a better bet. > > btw the sony screens are so crap, id use em as a toilet accessory... Yeah, yeah. Go back to wanking over strip poker on your 3510i then, the rest of us will enjoy the far superior screens fitted to the latest SE offerings. -- >>> Unlock Your Phone's Potential <<< >>> http://www.thephonelocker.co.uk <<< >>> http://www.uselessinfo.org.uk <<<
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<hEj4c.14810$x16.311440554@news-text.cableinet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!proxad.net!proxad.net!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!news-fe1!news-text.cableinet.net!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<40517d79$0$31903$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <c2seg6$13v6$1@otis.netspace.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ae63,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gid10ae63,public X-Google-Thread: f461e,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gidf461e,public X-Google-Thread: 10f383,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gid10f383,public X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public X-Google-Thread: fb718,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gidfb718,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-12 06:17:50 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!proxad.net!proxad.net!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!news-fe1!news-text.cableinet.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Richard Colton" <webmaster@NOSPAMuselessinfo.org.uk> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.ericsson,alt.cellular.gsm,alt.cellular.nokia,aus.comms.mobile,uk.telecom.mobile References: <40517d79$0$31903$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <c2seg6$13v6$1@otis.netspace.net.au> Subject: Re: SE vs NOKIA Lines: 51 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: <hEj4c.14810$x16.311440554@news-text.cableinet.net> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:49 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.38.152.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueyonder.co.uk X-Trace: news-text.cableinet.net 1079101069 82.38.152.2 (Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:49 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:49 GMT Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)