Article View: alt.cellular.ericsson
Article #174Re: SE vs NOKIA
From: michael turner
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:55
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:55
46 lines
3178 bytes
3178 bytes
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:59:33 +0000, Jon wrote: > > "yusuf786" <yusuf786@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message > news:40517d79$0$31903$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... >> Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so good. > In >> the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff, but now their >> products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look at the t68, after 2 >> years still selling for $500 here in Australia. No Nokia can do that. I > had >> my t68i for two years & still love it even though I just upgraded to a >> P900........ >> >> regards >> >> > > I agree, I've had a T68i for about 18 months and I love It! *MUCH better > after R8A upgrade*. I had a t68 for two years, and replaced it recently with a *Nokia* 6100. > About 3 weeks ago my Brother Bought a Z600, WHAT AN > AMAZING PHONE! - nothing from Nokia can match it, *7200 - tiny screen, > stupid keypad�, express-on Fablon�.* > > My next Sony Ericsson phone is going to be the sexy new K700 > > http://www.esato.com/news/article.php/id=57 How can a mobile-phone be 'sexy', are you going to *masturbate* with it or something..surely it's much cheaper just to buy a dildo. > Sexy Phones > http://www.sonyericsson.com > > Toy Phones > http://www.nokia.com Sad or what. -- Michael Turner Email (ROT13) zvxr.gheare1963@ivetva.arg
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<pan.2004.03.12.17.55.31.177000@ivetva.arg>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!216.196.106.140!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<40517d79$0$31903$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <c2s8n5$mu2$1@titan.btinternet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10ae63,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gid10ae63,public X-Google-Thread: f461e,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gidf461e,public X-Google-Thread: 10f383,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gid10f383,public X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public X-Google-Thread: fb718,dbdef50ae794473e X-Google-Attributes: gidfb718,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-12 09:55:38 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!216.196.106.140!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:55:36 -0600 From: michael turner <zvxr.gheare1963@ivetva.arg> Subject: Re: SE vs NOKIA Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:55:37 +0000 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Message-ID: <pan.2004.03.12.17.55.31.177000@ivetva.arg> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.ericsson,alt.cellular.gsm,alt.cellular.nokia,aus.comms.mobile,uk.telecom.mobile References: <40517d79$0$31903$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <c2s8n5$mu2$1@titan.btinternet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 46 X-Trace: sv3-h6P7TN/Dr9YDIFZNCLMq7yXR8+I4kMPFVnxucJl5kKV+fEY8miDvOxWfESJUB+ZJ1TXZ5+o046Xh5ox!EPEL94vaG44whzq+ZVDW6pHo3fuUE0hVO/qV2wXckAehYiuDDYjRIfzbckpo+S7A3DaQJA== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1