Article View: alt.cellular.ericsson
Article #379Re: nokia 8210 vs. Ericsson T28 ?
From: anon
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00
18 lines
1676 bytes
1676 bytes
Well I have had 4 T28's replaced by Ericsson after "Dying" apparently there is a batch of dud PA's on the last shipment. Nice phone and good when operating. But sheesh the hassle and grief associated with being without a phone for weeks and having to drive to repair agents. Never had a problem with any other phone. (except 1 failure of an Nokia 8110) I suspect the T28 is a bit lemony in the QA dept. Groover >SNIP< > I read that many Ericsson T28 phones just died after some time, with no > explanation from Ericsson is this so frequent ? why it happens ? > > I have friends whos ericsson T28 never died ? > SNIP<
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<39774286$0$11041@echo-01.iinet.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<39736A5D.2DE07911@flashnet.it>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ae63,441fad8e47d3be31 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ae63,public X-Google-Thread: fb718,441fad8e47d3be31 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb718,public X-Google-Thread: 10f383,441fad8e47d3be31 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f383,public X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,441fad8e47d3be31 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public X-Google-Thread: f461e,441fad8e47d3be31 X-Google-Attributes: gidf461e,public X-Google-Thread: 10fdcc,441fad8e47d3be31 X-Google-Attributes: gid10fdcc,public From: "anon" <anon@hotmail.com.au> Subject: Re: nokia 8210 vs. Ericsson T28 ? Date: 2000/07/21 Message-ID: <39774286$0$11041@echo-01.iinet.net.au> X-Deja-AN: 648693163 References: <39736A5D.2DE07911@flashnet.it> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Trace: news.iinet.net.au 964117126 11041 vzz9vt@203.59.90.44 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Newsgroups: alt.cellular.ericsson,alt.cellular.nokia,alt.cellular.telephones,uk.telecom.mobile,aus.comms.mobile,alt.cellular.gsm