Re: NEWS: US edges towards movie theater popcorn antitrust case

Article View: alt.cellular.t-mobile

Article #9

Back to alt.cellular.t-mobile Previous Next

From: Todd Allcock
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:12

28 lines
2550 bytes

"Steve Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote in message 
news:MPG.24ce59c06b520ba59896f9@news.justthe.net...
> In article <cNT8m.15439$YU5.13121@newsfe21.iad>,
> elecconnec@aNOoSPAMl.com says...
>
>
>> And 1900MHz, IIRC.  Your 3660 came later much later, and was the follow
>> up to the 3650.  (I had a 3620, which was the Noth American version which
>> substituted 850 for 900.)  Earlier Nokia phones, from the late 1990s to
>> 2001 or 2002, used the last two digits to indicate the phone technology
>> within a particular model: IIRC, 10 and 40 were 900/1800 GSM, 20 and 60
>> were (North American) TDMA, 70 and 80 were NA CDMA, and 90 was NA (1900)
>> GSM.  In 2001 I used a GSM 8290 while my wife used the virtually
>> identical looking TDMA-based 8260.
>
>
> 20 = 1900MHz TDMA
> 60 = 800MHz TDMA
> 70 = 1900MHz CDMA
> 80 = 800MHz CMDA

I'm not sure the numbering on the TDMA models were set in stone.  The 2160, 
5120 and 6120 were "dual mode" 800MHz analog/TDMA, and the 5160, 6160, and 
8260 were "tri-mode"- 800MHz analog/TDMA, 1900MHz TDMA.  I suspect the 
number designations themselves evolved over time.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <rJ79m.15623$YU5.10599@newsfe21.iad>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe21.iad.POSTED!f09e3bc5!not-for-mail

References:

<lH07m.15658$bq1.1314@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <op.uw5cjwqzo63xbg@acer250.gateway.2wire.net> <4a5ec5b9$0$1629$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <MPG.24c930a1a4dfd5b99896ed@news.justthe.net> <4A63F397.41E575F4@batrabbit.eu> <cNT8m.15439$YU5.13121@newsfe21.iad> <MPG.24ce59c06b520ba59896f9@news.justthe.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,ae5a811eee72da3a
X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe21.iad.POSTED!f09e3bc5!not-for-mail
From: "Todd Allcock" <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.t-mobile,alt.cellular.verizon,ba.internet
References: <lH07m.15658$bq1.1314@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <op.uw5cjwqzo63xbg@acer250.gateway.2wire.net> <4a5ec5b9$0$1629$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <MPG.24c930a1a4dfd5b99896ed@news.justthe.net> <4A63F397.41E575F4@batrabbit.eu> <cNT8m.15439$YU5.13121@newsfe21.iad> <MPG.24ce59c06b520ba59896f9@news.justthe.net>
In-Reply-To: <MPG.24ce59c06b520ba59896f9@news.justthe.net>
Subject: Re: NEWS: US edges towards movie theater popcorn antitrust case
Lines: 29
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 format=flowed;
 charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
Message-ID: <rJ79m.15623$YU5.10599@newsfe21.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@WWWSpace.NET
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:12:07 UTC
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:12:00 -0600

Reply to Parent Message