Article View: alt.cellular.verizon
Article #52Re: NEWS: US edges towards mobile antitrust case
From: Richard B. Gilbert
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:25
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:25
56 lines
4375 bytes
4375 bytes
Ness-Net wrote: > > "Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message > news:87hbxj7mlk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net... >> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> writes: >> >>> John Blutarsky wrote: >>>> nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote in >>> >>>>> I told you were you lied, retard. F___ off. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Then you were wrong. Does that mean that you are the liar? Or does >>>> that mean that you are the retard? >>> >>> It means that it's one more clueless newbie for the kill-file. >>> >>> His entertainment value came from his willingness to lie and >>> distort. Alas, the show is no longer amusing. >> >> Sound like we have a cabal of liars here, all desparately trying >> to deny the fact that cell phone companies are charging exhorbitant >> rates for text messages - 20 cents for a message that costs under >> a penny to process. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB > > Bill, you base your assumptions on 'some scientist' who doesn't have the > 'insider' information > necessary to accurately estimate the costs. It is an educated guess - > and is almost certainly wrong. > > Since I can't discuss this subject because of multiple NDAs I've signed, > I can't SHOW that you are wrong. > But, let's just say there is considerably more to this than you state - > or obviously realize. > > Let's just say I do know what the $$ are - you cannot be more wrong. > > You don't have to "text". Indeed, I spent something like the first fifty years of my life without a cell phone. I got along just fine! I spent something like the first forty years of my life without electronic mail! Amazing!! If you don't like the price, don't use the service. I doubt that VZW or whoever will notice or care if they do notice. There is NO way that you can require someone to sell you goods or services you specify at prices you select!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<p-CdncKBotj6KcbXnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@giganews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<kc37551nu2kjgpqb6pff4668ielk1jrf09@4ax.com> <w955m.14633$%02.14521@newsfe15.iad> <87ocruajae.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <nt9a55pgat88gvnsmma09ti8h30s3ma9i0@4ax.com> <87eisqeogn.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <bmba55lv8rjj8vcfv1v6kp2jjc0m8p8rv9@4ax.com> <87bpnupvp2.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C42B80BC54DDblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87prcatjk6.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C43A93131B4Eblutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87r5wpgx18.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C43C3DB7A618blutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87iqi1co6c.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C43C959A11EEblutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87ljmx6w0n.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C43E3F69429Eblutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <878wixqemr.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C44AD2B4AC2Bblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd4f7f9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C44B102E9C90blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <oeR5m.13793$OF1.3541@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <87hbxj7mlk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <7smdnUH9ksKH7cbXnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@giganews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,70f2e018f89541d7 X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:25:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:25:35 -0400 From: "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@comcast.net> Reply-To: rgilbert88@comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular.t-mobile,ba.internet Subject: Re: NEWS: US edges towards mobile antitrust case References: <kc37551nu2kjgpqb6pff4668ielk1jrf09@4ax.com> <w955m.14633$%02.14521@newsfe15.iad> <87ocruajae.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <nt9a55pgat88gvnsmma09ti8h30s3ma9i0@4ax.com> <87eisqeogn.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <bmba55lv8rjj8vcfv1v6kp2jjc0m8p8rv9@4ax.com> <87bpnupvp2.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C42B80BC54DDblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87prcatjk6.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C43A93131B4Eblutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87r5wpgx18.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C43C3DB7A618blutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87iqi1co6c.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C43C959A11EEblutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87ljmx6w0n.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C43E3F69429Eblutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <878wixqemr.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C44AD2B4AC2Bblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd4f7f9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C44B102E9C90blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <oeR5m.13793$OF1.3541@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <87hbxj7mlk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <7smdnUH9ksKH7cbXnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@giganews.com> In-Reply-To: <7smdnUH9ksKH7cbXnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <p-CdncKBotj6KcbXnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 56 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-XQbBkCON/MA0aeWvWqMPBVoxf1ohlpud8YxAGD14t8QY/m9JelSXoejUd7b+bLzh0TLQ64oVoeNfGrT!O+rz6gEYQ5W0xrdabhfmkZLx/bbI09mvzy9YcYiBN/kv2odWQXUOLCUYF7UL7CDdupsaT6H0keA= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.39 X-Original-Bytes: 4121