Article View: alt.cellular.verizon
Article #54Re: NEWS: US edges towards mobile antitrust case
From: John Blutarsky
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:02
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:02
57 lines
3879 bytes
3879 bytes
nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote in news:87hbxge5af.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net: > "Ness-Net" <richard.nodamn@nessnet.spam.com> writes: > >> "Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message >> news:871vol5ori.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net... >>> John Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com> writes: >>> >>>> nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote in >>>> news:87prc5wlrs.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net: >>>> >>>>> John Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote in >>>>>> news:87eisl3o4f.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net: >>>>>> >>>>>>> John Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Boost charges $50 for unlimited voice. But now you are arguing >>>>>>>> in circles, as yo have claimed many times that pricing for >>>>>>>> voice has no place in this discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It doesn't. The issue was the high charge for text messages, >>>>>>> not "unlimited plans" where you may end up paying for more than >>>>>>> you need. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then why did you sudduenly bring voice prices into the >>>>>> conversation? >>>>> >>>>> I didn't, aside from using voice prices to set an upper bound on >>>>> the cost of a text message - estimating it as being roughly >>>>> equivalent to 1/4 seconds of a voice call. >>>>> >>>> >>>> How did you come up with that estimate? >>> >>> >>> I guess you don't know very much about the technology. :-) With the >>> level of compression they use, it takes roughly a kilobyte per >>> second to handle a voice call (more is better of course). So figure >>> on 250 bytes for the text message (message text + overhead such as >>> the destination phone number and other protocol-specific data). >>> >>> That will get you fairly close to the actual number, assuming the >>> cost of voice service is realistic. >> >> As one who DOES "know very much about the technology" it is VERY >> obvious - you DON'T! > > It is pretty damn obvious to me that you are have never learned how > to estimate things. > > Don't you get it, LJ? He doesn't have to estimate- he KNOWS the associated costs.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xns9C47AD5F6D90Dblutofabercom@85.214.113.135>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9C44AD2B4AC2Bblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd4f7f9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C44B102E9C90blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <oeR5m.13793$OF1.3541@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <87hbxj7mlk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <32X5m.1032$nU7.206@newsfe20.iad> <87y6qvlz03.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C45A08962098blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd2pf31.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C4656BE11373blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87eisl3o4f.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C46879759D4blutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87prc5wlrs.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C46AE6FE542Eblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <871vol5ori.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <IqGdnSi895Gn7MbXnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <87hbxge5af.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,70f2e018f89541d7 X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mail From: John Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular.t-mobile,ba.internet Subject: Re: NEWS: US edges towards mobile antitrust case Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Your Company Lines: 57 Message-ID: <Xns9C47AD5F6D90Dblutofabercom@85.214.113.135> References: <Xns9C44AD2B4AC2Bblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd4f7f9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C44B102E9C90blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <oeR5m.13793$OF1.3541@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <87hbxj7mlk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <32X5m.1032$nU7.206@newsfe20.iad> <87y6qvlz03.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C45A08962098blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd2pf31.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C4656BE11373blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87eisl3o4f.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C46879759D4blutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87prc5wlrs.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C46AE6FE542Eblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <871vol5ori.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <IqGdnSi895Gn7MbXnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <87hbxge5af.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> X-Trace: news.eternal-september.org U2FsdGVkX18v701oL4aGMpm59d9Sz+9I5H68zobSkx8FpD03jn7ho9np6uKQNBinbamMpl8CPgV6lp2M84+89VKa6tYPfd13QI/0+Jbx4YJbYWb4iavr0eOHHFlcRwIqoqvthBgEJ84= X-Complaints-To: abuse@eternal-september.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:02:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+NUOLijXaoMnV0QlQp/Dff9qZx/EI9LNU= Cancel-Lock: sha1:G/p1XIyZYSTzmucm9xxBfDcgtzQ=