🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.verizon
Article #54

Re: NEWS: US edges towards mobile antitrust case

#54
From: John Blutarsky
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:02
57 lines
3879 bytes
nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote in
news:87hbxge5af.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net: 

> "Ness-Net" <richard.nodamn@nessnet.spam.com> writes:
> 
>> "Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
>> news:871vol5ori.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net... 
>>> John Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote in
>>>> news:87prc5wlrs.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net:
>>>>
>>>>> John Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote in
>>>>>> news:87eisl3o4f.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boost charges $50 for unlimited voice.  But now you are arguing
>>>>>>>> in circles, as yo have claimed many times that pricing for
>>>>>>>> voice has no place in this discussion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It doesn't.  The issue was the high charge for text messages,
>>>>>>> not "unlimited plans" where you may end up paying for more than
>>>>>>> you need. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then why did you sudduenly bring voice prices into the
>>>>>> conversation? 
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't, aside from using voice prices to set an upper bound on
>>>>> the cost of a text message - estimating it as being roughly
>>>>> equivalent to 1/4 seconds of a voice call.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How did you come up with that estimate?
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess you don't know very much about the technology. :-) With the
>>> level of compression they use, it takes roughly a kilobyte per
>>> second to handle a voice call (more is better of course).  So figure
>>> on 250 bytes for the text message (message text + overhead such as
>>> the destination phone number and other protocol-specific data).
>>>
>>> That will get you fairly close to the actual number, assuming the
>>> cost of voice service is realistic.
>>
>> As one who DOES "know very much about the technology" it is VERY
>> obvious - you DON'T!
> 
> It is pretty damn obvious to me that you are have never learned how
> to estimate things.
> 
> 

Don't you get it, LJ?  He doesn't have to estimate- he KNOWS the associated 
costs.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Xns9C47AD5F6D90Dblutofabercom@85.214.113.135>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mail
References: <Xns9C44AD2B4AC2Bblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd4f7f9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C44B102E9C90blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <oeR5m.13793$OF1.3541@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <87hbxj7mlk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <32X5m.1032$nU7.206@newsfe20.iad> <87y6qvlz03.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C45A08962098blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd2pf31.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C4656BE11373blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87eisl3o4f.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C46879759D4blutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87prc5wlrs.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C46AE6FE542Eblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <871vol5ori.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <IqGdnSi895Gn7MbXnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <87hbxge5af.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: aa617e85ca,70f2e018f89541d7
X-Google-Attributes: gidaa617e85ca,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mail
From: John Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular.t-mobile,ba.internet
Subject: Re: NEWS: US edges towards mobile antitrust case
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:02:33 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Your Company
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <Xns9C47AD5F6D90Dblutofabercom@85.214.113.135>
References: <Xns9C44AD2B4AC2Bblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd4f7f9.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C44B102E9C90blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <oeR5m.13793$OF1.3541@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <87hbxj7mlk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <32X5m.1032$nU7.206@newsfe20.iad> <87y6qvlz03.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C45A08962098blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87fxd2pf31.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C4656BE11373blutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <87eisl3o4f.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C46879759D4blutofabercom@85.214.113.135> <87prc5wlrs.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9C46AE6FE542Eblutofabercom@188.40.43.213> <871vol5ori.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <IqGdnSi895Gn7MbXnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <87hbxge5af.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>
X-Trace: news.eternal-september.org U2FsdGVkX18v701oL4aGMpm59d9Sz+9I5H68zobSkx8FpD03jn7ho9np6uKQNBinbamMpl8CPgV6lp2M84+89VKa6tYPfd13QI/0+Jbx4YJbYWb4iavr0eOHHFlcRwIqoqvthBgEJ84=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eternal-september.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:02:33 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+NUOLijXaoMnV0QlQp/Dff9qZx/EI9LNU=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:G/p1XIyZYSTzmucm9xxBfDcgtzQ=