🚀 go-pugleaf

"Rod Speed" <rodspeed@ozemail.com.au> wrote:

>
>Tom MacIntyre <tmacinty@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:37c12e02.214234310@news1.ns.sympatico.ca...

>
>>> Even you should be able to grasp that they are a tiny subset
>>> of the total Win users. Adequately covered by the 'hardly anyone'
>
>> This "tiny subset" consists of those who solve
>> others' problems with Windows, and/or their own,
>
>Nope, plenty arent silly enough to be furiously bashing away on the keyboard
>at the dos prompt for much of that stuff and only use the dos prompt for the
>most basic stuff like doing a clean install or running scandisk on the boot drive.
>
>Where the quotes start right at the top was preceeded by a discussion
>about doing file manipulation at the dos prompt on a working Win9x system.
>NOT whats done on a system that cant even boot Win9x in safe mode etc.
>
>No point in hacking off the context and proceeding to rave on
>about what wasnt even being discussed there. That only produces
>dills like you claiming that I have changed my position on the use
>of the dos prompt when I have done absolutely nothing of the kind.
>

I certainly haven't raved, and I have tried to balance BW preservation
with retaining pertinent clips...you do it by quoting an entire
post...I don't...I might miss a time or two...strange that nobody else
complains of this...

>> and is hardly to be dismissed in such fashion.
>
>Sure is in the context that the quotes from me were made in at the top.

How can you mention context, when you have perpetrated the butchery
you've done here?...a lot of what your post contains was NOT together,
at least from my server, and in my memory. 

rest snipped...MAYBE later, if you're not careful...

Tom