🚀 go-pugleaf

Traveler wrote:

> Of course you could install a new "C" and install nt on that drive while win98 is
> on the physical "D" drive.  The new "C" dirve would be fat 16 and the "D" dirve
> could be fat 32.
>
> "Peter S." wrote:
>
> > Bruce Murphy schreef:
> >
> > > I bought this Microsoft kit but am having troubles installing NT Workstation
> > > 4.0 or NT server 4.0 on my computer with win 98. It can't find my hard drive
> > > while trying to install. Is it compatible with 98? And I am running fat 32
> > > does that make a difference?
> > >
> > >                                                                   Thanks,
> > >                                                                    Bruce
> > > Murphy
> >
> > Yes, it does matter. NT doesn't reconigze FAT32. So you have to switch back to
> > FAT16 or change drive. Install NT on d: or e:. I'm afraid this doesn't work
> > either because NT still needs c:. NT can boot from d: or e:, etc.
> >
> > Peter

I do not know where you got your computer skills from, but you need to go back and
ask for a refund.  If you move drive c: to drive d:, Windows 98 will complain because
it has everything set-up for drive c: already, including INSIDE the registry
database!  Then, there is the Win.ini file, and all the applications that may have
INI files that point to C:.


Signed,
Wolfe Strickland,
CompTIA A+ Certified Service Technician

"Understand, and see the light.  Memorize, and live in darkness." -- Wolfe
Strickland.