🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <6p28ni$o0l$1@plug.news.pipex.net>,
  "Pipex Mail" <WillChapman@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> IMO, without a doubt CA-Visual Objects. BUt you should do a search on the
> subject in DejaNews as it has been covered at length in a number of previous
> threads.
>
> --
>
> Cheers......
>
> Will
> Want to know VO?
> Visit KnowVO, the VIsual Objects knowledgebase
> at http://www.knowvo.com
> Have you made a contribution lately?
> ct wrote in message <35b3a352.0@news.sirnet.it>...
> |"Stephen C. Lupton" <slupton@connectnet.com> wrote:
> |
> |>Markus Wiederstein wrote:
> |>>
> |>> Ok folks,
> |>>
> |>> i would like to start a small-talk for porting clipper apps
> |>> to windows.
> |>> I know there are different ways to do this and there are
> |>> lots of tools around.
> |I use clip4win.
> |I am very satisfied
> |
Surely CA-VO is at best slow, hard to learn and, in general, an unfortunate
mistake.  How many VO books do you see on the bookshop shelves?  How many VO
jobs do you see advertised in the pro press?  How many pro programmers do we
know in full time VO?  Answer to all is: very very few.
My advice: bite the bullet, learn Delphi.  You won't port, as such, but then
again, you won't to VO either.



-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum