Article View: alt.comp.databases.xbase.clipper
Article #137Re: Clipper -> Windows ! What Tool is best ?
From: Anne Krijger
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 00:00
9 lines
997 bytes
997 bytes
Virus@my-dejanews.com (Virus@my-dejanews.com) wrote:> > Surely CA-VO is at best slow, hard to learn and, in general, an unfortunate > mistake. How's that ? Which version did you use and what problems did you have with it ? Anne.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<VA.00000316.0106e5bd@anne>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6p6vlt$5tt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f469f,7b8cb8b7cb37a920 X-Google-Attributes: gidf469f,public X-Google-Thread: f6290,7b8cb8b7cb37a920 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6290,public X-Google-Thread: 116614,7b8cb8b7cb37a920 X-Google-Attributes: gid116614,public X-Google-Thread: 11629a,7b8cb8b7cb37a920 X-Google-Attributes: gid11629a,public From: Anne Krijger <anne@wirehub.nl> Subject: Re: Clipper -> Windows ! What Tool is best ? Date: 1998/07/23 Message-ID: <VA.00000316.0106e5bd@anne> X-Deja-AN: 374346395 References: <6p6vlt$5tt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Organization: Wirehub! Internet Reply-To: anne@wirehub.nl Newsgroups: alt.comp.databases.xbase.clipper,comp.lang.clipper,comp.lang.clipper.visual-objects,fido.clipper