Article View: alt.comp.databases
Article #43Is SQL 7 optimiszer smart enough ?!
From: Dan G
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 00:00
33 lines
2173 bytes
2173 bytes
Hello all, I propose all of you one puzzle: Problem: Consider one table with col1,col2 (with 23.682 records) with non-cluster index on col2 Run this query with show stat i/o on (in SQL 7): select col1 from table order by col2 The result was: (23682 row(s) affected) 1) Table 'POS'. Scan count 1, logical reads 23782, physical reads 1175, read-ahead reads 94. in 22 seconds 2) Table 'POS'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1132, physical reads 628, read-ahead reads 1136. in 7 seconds Query: 1)Which of the above results have been returned by using table scan and which one by using the index on col2 ? . 2)Does the optimiser used table scan or the index ?. I am looking forward ...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7qooh5$h93$1@pollux.ip-plus.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f816f,e51e0c474236855d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf816f,public X-Google-Thread: fa4f9,e51e0c474236855d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfa4f9,public X-Google-Thread: 104de1,e51e0c474236855d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid104de1,public X-Google-Thread: f6611,e51e0c474236855d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf6611,public X-Google-Thread: 10a90d,e51e0c474236855d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10a90d,public X-Google-Thread: f99a8,e51e0c474236855d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf99a8,public X-Google-Thread: fc874,e51e0c474236855d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfc874,public X-Google-Thread: 107d2f,e51e0c474236855d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid107d2f,public From: "Dan G" <Gavrilescu.Daniel@pmintl.ch> Subject: Is SQL 7 optimiszer smart enough ?! Date: 1999/09/03 Message-ID: <7qooh5$h93$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> X-Deja-AN: 520646111 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: news@ip-plus.net X-Trace: pollux.ip-plus.net 936371557 17699 194.209.91.2 (3 Sep 1999 15:12:37 GMT) Organization: Swisscom IP+ (post doesn't reflect views of Swisscom) NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Sep 1999 15:12:37 GMT Newsgroups: alt.comp.databases,bit.databases,bit.databases.mssql-l,comp.databases.ms-sqlserver,comp.databases.oracle.misc,comp.databases.oracle.server,microsoft.public.sqlserver,microsoft.public.sqlserver.misc,microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming,microsoft