Article View: alt.comp.databases
Article #45Re: 100.000 $ Reward (Oracle 8 versus SQL 7)
From: Dan G
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00
52 lines
2561 bytes
2561 bytes
Ed, If you're not sure about the examples why do you claim the reward ;-x ?. Ed Prochak wrote in message <7qp68f$s67$1@nnrp1.deja.com>... > > >So do you want us to compare SQL7 with Oracle 7.3 or can we use Oracle >8? (Let's see how can we compare SQL7 favorably to Oracle? I know, >we'll compare against the outdated version!) > >Regarding the "reward", I'm not sure what 5 examples I need to give. > Ones where the web page is wrong about Oracle? (To begin with, lots of >those ideas have been published before. They are not new.) > > Or ones where Oracle is better than SQL7? Given that I don't know as >much about SQL7, I guess I'm out of this one. 8^( > >Who's offering the reward money, you? How do I claim it? > > > >In article <7qoogi$h44$1@pollux.ip-plus.net>, > "Dan G" <Gavrilescu.Daniel@pmintl.ch> wrote: >> Check this out first !: >> http://www.dbpd.com/vault/9801xtra.htm >> >> Second: I am not an Microsoft fan (even if I am using MS SQL). >> >> Allmost all Oracle commandments (applicable to SQL 7) doesn't need to >be >> applied with SQL 7 because the query optimizer is smart enough. >> Allmost all Oracle enhancemets (written in the article) apllied as >well with >> SQL 7. >> The one who can give more than 5 examples against the above >statements worth >> the prize ;-). >> >> All the best. >> >> > >-- >Ed Prochak >Magic Interface, Ltd. >ORACLE services >440-498-3700 <<<NOTE new number > > >Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ >Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7r0082$gp0$1@pollux.ip-plus.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7qoogi$h44$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> <7qp68f$s67$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a90d,cf07aa645cdd594e X-Google-Attributes: gid10a90d,public X-Google-Thread: 104de1,cf07aa645cdd594e X-Google-Attributes: gid104de1,public X-Google-Thread: f6611,cf07aa645cdd594e X-Google-Attributes: gidf6611,public X-Google-Thread: fc874,cf07aa645cdd594e X-Google-Attributes: gidfc874,public From: "Dan G" <Gavrilescu.Daniel@pmintl.ch> Subject: Re: 100.000 $ Reward (Oracle 8 versus SQL 7) Date: 1999/09/06 Message-ID: <7r0082$gp0$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> X-Deja-AN: 521603675 References: <7qoogi$h44$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> <7qp68f$s67$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: news@ip-plus.net X-Trace: pollux.ip-plus.net 936608834 17184 194.209.91.2 (6 Sep 1999 09:07:14 GMT) Organization: Swisscom IP+ (post doesn't reflect views of Swisscom) NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Sep 1999 09:07:14 GMT Newsgroups: alt.comp.databases,bit.databases,bit.databases.mssql-l,comp.databases.ms-sqlserver