🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.databases
Article #45

Re: 100.000 $ Reward (Oracle 8 versus SQL 7)

#45
From: Dan G
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00
52 lines
2561 bytes
Ed,
If you're not sure about the examples why do you claim the reward ;-x ?.


Ed Prochak wrote in message <7qp68f$s67$1@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>
>
>So do you want us to compare SQL7 with Oracle 7.3 or can we use Oracle
>8? (Let's see how can we compare SQL7 favorably to Oracle? I know,
>we'll compare against the outdated version!)
>
>Regarding the "reward", I'm not sure what 5 examples I need to give.
> Ones where the web page is wrong about Oracle? (To begin with, lots of
>those ideas have been published before. They are not new.)
>
> Or ones where Oracle is better than SQL7? Given that I don't know as
>much about SQL7, I guess I'm out of this one. 8^(
>
>Who's offering the reward money, you? How do I claim it?
>
>
>
>In article <7qoogi$h44$1@pollux.ip-plus.net>,
>  "Dan G" <Gavrilescu.Daniel@pmintl.ch> wrote:
>> Check this out first !:
>> http://www.dbpd.com/vault/9801xtra.htm
>>
>> Second: I am not an Microsoft fan (even if I am using MS SQL).
>>
>> Allmost all Oracle commandments (applicable to SQL 7) doesn't need to
>be
>> applied with SQL 7 because the query optimizer is smart enough.
>> Allmost all Oracle enhancemets (written in the article) apllied as
>well with
>> SQL 7.
>> The one who can give more than 5 examples against the above
>statements worth
>> the prize ;-).
>>
>> All the best.
>>
>>
>
>--
>Ed Prochak
>Magic Interface, Ltd.
>ORACLE services
>440-498-3700 <<<NOTE new number
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7r0082$gp0$1@pollux.ip-plus.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <7qoogi$h44$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> <7qp68f$s67$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10a90d,cf07aa645cdd594e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a90d,public
X-Google-Thread: 104de1,cf07aa645cdd594e
X-Google-Attributes: gid104de1,public
X-Google-Thread: f6611,cf07aa645cdd594e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6611,public
X-Google-Thread: fc874,cf07aa645cdd594e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc874,public
From: "Dan G" <Gavrilescu.Daniel@pmintl.ch>
Subject: Re: 100.000 $ Reward (Oracle 8 versus SQL 7)
Date: 1999/09/06
Message-ID: <7r0082$gp0$1@pollux.ip-plus.net>
X-Deja-AN: 521603675
References: <7qoogi$h44$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> <7qp68f$s67$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To: news@ip-plus.net
X-Trace: pollux.ip-plus.net 936608834 17184 194.209.91.2 (6 Sep 1999 09:07:14 GMT)
Organization: Swisscom IP+ (post doesn't reflect views of Swisscom)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Sep 1999 09:07:14 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.comp.databases,bit.databases,bit.databases.mssql-l,comp.databases.ms-sqlserver