Article View: alt.comp.dcom.modems
Article #239Re: USR X2 Modems . Do they Work??? Or just hype.
From: Anthony Hill
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 00:00
36 lines
2961 bytes
2961 bytes
On 10 Apr 1997 14:01:20 GMT, "Doppleganger" <deathkeeper@usa.net_or_hotmail.com> wrote: >You know i have seen this so much it is funny, don't believe the hype, >software upgrading does not make a difference worthy of true harware for a >couple of reasons, this is just an advertising ploy to get people to buy >(it is the buy now upgrade free later that everyone will want to buy our >product belief people have ploy). Belive me I have a 33.6 Kbps modem and my >ISP has a 28.8 Kbps which I depending on the time of day and number of >users get a 57.6 Kbps connection due to compression, my friend who has the >same modem gets a connection of 115.2 Kbps since his ISP uses 33.6 Kbps The 57.6 and 115.2kbps that you and your friend are seeing have absolutely nothing to do with connect speed. That's the DTE rate, which is the speed that your modem and your computer are talking to each other. It is set through software. >modems entirely, they are new around here but long distance, but my ISP is >going to get all 33.6 Kbps modems, also even a good modem doesn't mean >squat, cause generally the only time you actually get the full effect of >the connection i on E-Mail transit and New Group transit since the servers >already have it there to pull from them, but over the internet makes very >little difference in any case since it matter at what bandwidth your ISP is >pulling and transmitting and what kind of connections are thru the enitre >line of access, ex. a 57.6 Kbps connection to ISP, a T3 connection to the >internet hub, all the routing done thru the hub (each connection you must >navigate), and aT1 connection o the other server with a lower bandwidth may >end up with an actual 14.4 Kbps through-put. So it makes no difference at If your provider has a decent upstream connection you should notice an improvement in performance when downloading from at least some sites. Of course, many providers don't have a decent upstream connection. Anthony Hill | Despite popular belief, this ahill@travel-net.com | is NOT a .sig file.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<334bd844.2928326@nntp.uunet.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<MPG.dae1e941dd3feac989680@news.wired2.net> <33494760.20617535@library.airnews.net> <01bc42f9$2ca78fc0$5733facf@ptimt> <01bc45b8$b8428f00$2d014ec6@mycomputer.lwcomm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1062ec,a1888712c28d7845 X-Google-Attributes: gid1062ec,public X-Google-Thread: 10beba,6d747c56c468c3 X-Google-Attributes: gid10beba,public X-Google-Thread: 102a94,b7b59443563dcaa2 X-Google-Attributes: gid102a94,public X-Google-Thread: 1108fc,927fc9f8a708a038 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108fc,public From: ahill@travel-net.com (Anthony Hill) Subject: Re: USR X2 Modems . Do they Work??? Or just hype. Date: 1997/04/09 Message-ID: <334bd844.2928326@nntp.uunet.ca> X-Deja-AN: 232119967 References: <MPG.dae1e941dd3feac989680@news.wired2.net> <33494760.20617535@library.airnews.net> <01bc42f9$2ca78fc0$5733facf@ptimt> <01bc45b8$b8428f00$2d014ec6@mycomputer.lwcomm.com> Organization: UUNET Canada News Transport Newsgroups: alt.comp.dcom.modems,comp.dcom.modems,comp.modems,demon.tech.modems