🚀 go-pugleaf

The setup.exe you refer to at the end of this post was probably just a
loader for another app. If it is sufficient that the apps should be updated
after they have restarted, copy them to another name, start the main app via
a loader, and copy the temp to the proper exe at this time.

As for the updating mechanism, I know that Wise do some kind of internet
updates. It could not be that difficult to write an ActiveX doing this
yourself, or?

And - keep your money. You don't want to set a bad example, do you?

Johan Rosengren
Responsable Informatique
PACTA S.A.

AIMS a �crit dans le message <37664c73@news.uk.ibm.net>...
>Please Reply only to aims@ibm.net
>
>We are looking for an application that will enable us to update our
software
>package from the web to our client installations.
>We have a software apllication that has some 100 + .exe files that are
>updated regularly (up to 10 executables may change daily).
>Our ideal solution would be for our customers to log in to our web site
>where a process would search the customer's installation (whether on their
>local PC or on their server) and check whether there are any new updates.
>The customer would then have the option to download and install the updated
>files automatically.
>We have tried most of the commercially available install packages without
>much success.
>Additionally,we want the abilty to install in the server a new version of
an
>executable while it is already open by another user.
>Back in the old days of DOS as soon as the EXE was loaded in memory it was
>freed up and I could replace it any time (except when the EXE had
overlays).
>Now we have to tell the customer 'please close the executable so that I can
>install new version' something which is not easy because the executable on
>the server is open by about 20-30 users.
>However when I initially installed my Delphi compiler the SETUP.EXE that
was
>executed was loaded into memory and released from the server. I could see
>from my Novell and NT console that the SETUP.EXE was no longer in use.
>
>How did these guys do it? Could it be because their SETUP.EXE was only 42K
>and my EXE is 2MB?
>
>A $100 reward is offered to anyone that can assist in finding a suitable
>solution.
>
>Please reply to aims@ibm.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>