🚀 go-pugleaf

Tony Morgan <tonym@atomor.demon.co.uk> wrote:
TM> In article <351eca08.0@news1.ibm.net>, WeBmaster <raze2k@ibm.net> writes
TM> >By the way, just because you're too lazy to upgrade to IE4 or NS4
TM>
TM> Its people who can't be bothered to write pages that downgrade
TM> gracefully to older browsers who are lazy.

I like the button I see on some pages;
                     "Best Viewed With A BROWSER"

TM> Such people should put a banner on their entry page saying:
TM> "Unless you're running IE4 or NS4 then don't bother to visit my site
TM> because I'm a selfish pratt".

Dern tootin'!

TM> There's a lot of people using the net who can't afford the hardware to
TM> run IE4 or NS4. Ever tried running them on a 386 - or even a 66Hz 486
TM> with 16M memory?

I installed NS4 on my Pentium 133; was so disgusted at the bloated
sluggishness that it didn't last the afternoon. I'm staying at Nav Gold 3.04;
if some twit wants to write a page it can't handle, it's their loss of
business.