Article View: alt.comp.hardware.amd.thunderbird
Article #102Re: Watercooling newsgroup ?
From: David Maynard
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:59
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:59
47 lines
3047 bytes
3047 bytes
BillW wrote: > The "good posting methodology" are stupid rules made by people with big egos > that think everyone should do as them. Bottom posting makes no sense as it > makes everyone spend half their time searching for new data or reading data > they have already read. I always have top posted and always will as that is > the most efficient way........ And I'd bet you've never read word one about the subject. > > "David Maynard" <dNOTmayn@ev1.net> wrote in message > news:3F1E52A6.4030100@ev1.net... > >>Phil Weldon wrote: >> >>>Thanks for the nice list of URL's on usenet posting, but top-posting >> > still > >>>seems more in tune with the development of internet use and capability. >>> >>>Phil Weldon, pweldon.mindspring.com >>> >>> >> >>Well, it's 'in tune' with 'developments' in that it coincides with the > > rapid > >>influx of people who are unfamiliar with good posting methodology, as was > > noted > >>in one of the articles. >> >>But I was replying to Koop's comment "netiquette dictates that either top > > or > >>bottom posting is O.K. as long as it remains consistent" and that is not > > the case. > >> > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3F264577.6020707@ev1.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<bf7rbn$berqp$1@ID-140641.news.uni-berlin.de> <bf9gj3$bul$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3F194136.1080007@bigpond.UPPERnetCASE.au> <bfbjqf$rc$1@slb4.atl.mindspring.net> <DiDSa.13636$Mc.990396@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <27bcdc86.0307221802.3d14ed98@posting.google.com> <3F1DF8CB.8060307@ev1.net> <bfl0dv$gne$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <3F1E52A6.4030100@ev1.net> <O_UUa.13576$Vx2.6688576@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f7ef8,c088758a273fb549 X-Google-Attributes: gidf7ef8,public X-Google-Thread: 10483c,c088758a273fb549 X-Google-Attributes: gid10483c,public X-Google-Thread: feaeb,c088758a273fb549 X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public X-Google-Thread: 112d2c,c088758a273fb549 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d2c,public X-Google-Thread: 100562,c088758a273fb549 X-Google-Attributes: gid100562,public X-Google-Thread: faad6,c088758a273fb549 X-Google-Attributes: gidfaad6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-29 02:59:22 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: David Maynard <dNOTmayn@ev1.net> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.amd.thunderbird,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,dk.edb.hardware.overclocking Subject: Re: Watercooling newsgroup ? Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 04:59:19 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <3F264577.6020707@ev1.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <bf7rbn$berqp$1@ID-140641.news.uni-berlin.de> <bf9gj3$bul$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3F194136.1080007@bigpond.UPPERnetCASE.au> <bfbjqf$rc$1@slb4.atl.mindspring.net> <DiDSa.13636$Mc.990396@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <27bcdc86.0307221802.3d14ed98@posting.google.com> <3F1DF8CB.8060307@ev1.net> <bfl0dv$gne$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <3F1E52A6.4030100@ev1.net> <O_UUa.13576$Vx2.6688576@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 49