Re: About DDR single or dual ???

Article View: alt.comp.hardware.amd.thunderbird

Article #123

Back to alt.comp.hardware.amd.thunderbird Previous Next

#123

From: Nick
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 04:20

33 lines
2713 bytes

one stick of 256 is the recomended standard for overclockers

"Bonny Jock" <BJock@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:I98o8.71523$o52.411672719@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Horse Paddies!!!   one stick of 256 will be faster (though I doubt you'll
> notice it) than 2 sticks of 128, everything else being equal.
>
> --its a fact.
>
>
> "Special K" <karl@broeders.orgy> wrote in message
> news:1017167521.8299.0@eurus.uk.clara.net...
> >
> > "Mathieu" <Waddell.Mathieu@hydro.qc.ca> wrote in message
> > news:UY2o8.14604$R8.1362446@carnaval.risq.qc.ca...
> > > Hi, someone told me that with 2 dimm of DDR memory I would be faster
> than
> > > only one (for example, I want to put 256 meg of DDR pc2100 memory on
my
> > next
> > > board which will probably be an EpOx 8KHA+, so should I go with 2 dimm
> of
> > > 128 or only 1 of 256 to be faster, I dont care if I cant upgrade
later).
> > >
> >
> > Doesn't matter unless you have an nForce board.
> >
> > K
> >
> >
>
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <ua2i48dfhu0m72@corp.supernews.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail

References:

<UY2o8.14604$R8.1362446@carnaval.risq.qc.ca> <1017167521.8299.0@eurus.uk.clara.net> <I98o8.71523$o52.411672719@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f7ef8,771b6c011917bb04
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7ef8,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d2c,771b6c011917bb04
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d2c,public
X-Google-Thread: faad6,771b6c011917bb04
X-Google-Attributes: gidfaad6,public
X-Google-Thread: f92ef,771b6c011917bb04
X-Google-Attributes: gidf92ef,public
X-Google-Thread: 111829,771b6c011917bb04
X-Google-Attributes: gid111829,public
X-Google-Thread: fcf04,771b6c011917bb04
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcf04,public
X-Google-Thread: 115126,771b6c011917bb04
X-Google-Attributes: gid115126,public
X-Google-Thread: 100562,771b6c011917bb04
X-Google-Attributes: gid100562,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-26 20:20:24 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Nick" <Electrohacker@cyberdude.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.amd.thunderbird,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.epox,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.m-tech,dk.edb.hardware.overclocking,fido7.ru.overclo
Subject: Re: About DDR single or dual ???
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:20:24 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <ua2i48dfhu0m72@corp.supernews.com>
References: <UY2o8.14604$R8.1362446@carnaval.risq.qc.ca> <1017167521.8299.0@eurus.uk.clara.net> <I98o8.71523$o52.411672719@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Lines: 35

Reply to Parent Message