Article View: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt
Article #165Re: chances on NOT overclocking celeronA?
From: *
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00
21 lines
1466 bytes
1466 bytes
RnB wrote: > sirota wrote: > > > Hi ! > > > > In a couple of days I am going to upgrade my 200 MMX to Celeron 366 or 400. > > I want to ask the man to overclock the CPU. So, could you tell me the > > minimum barrier of the risk ? > > > > The likelyhood of overclocking a 366 or 400 is far less (near impossible) to > doing same to the famed C266 or 300A > > Why? what is the chances of over clocking a 333? cheers J Devereux
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36CB5DF1.77E0EA6C@mail.connect.usq.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7a64sv$coo$1@news.wantree.com.au> <x9Hx2.1$PU1.1719@vic.nntp.telstra.net> <36C75C41.1498F43B@uq.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f70d1,ca27ed799978764e X-Google-Attributes: gidf70d1,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,ca27ed799978764e X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-Thread: 111bbe,ca27ed799978764e X-Google-Attributes: gid111bbe,public From: * <q9421877@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> Subject: Re: chances on NOT overclocking celeronA? Date: 1999/02/18 Message-ID: <36CB5DF1.77E0EA6C@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> X-Deja-AN: 445517259 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7a64sv$coo$1@news.wantree.com.au> <x9Hx2.1$PU1.1719@vic.nntp.telstra.net> <36C75C41.1498F43B@uq.net.au> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: Abuse@USQ.edu.au X-Trace: usenet.usq.edu.au 919297544 12851 139.86.24.106 (18 Feb 1999 00:25:44 GMT) Organization: University of Southern Queensland (Test) Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Feb 1999 00:25:44 GMT Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,aus.ads.forsale.computers,aus.computers