🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt
Article #165

Re: chances on NOT overclocking celeronA?

#165
From: *
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00
21 lines
1466 bytes

RnB wrote:

> sirota wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
> > In a couple of days I am going to upgrade my 200 MMX to Celeron 366 or 400.
> > I want to ask the man to overclock the CPU. So, could you tell me the
> > minimum barrier of the risk ?
> >
>
> The  likelyhood of overclocking a 366 or 400 is far less (near impossible) to
> doing same to the famed C266 or 300A
>
>

Why? what is the chances of over clocking a 333?
cheers
J Devereux
Technical Details
Message-ID: <36CB5DF1.77E0EA6C@mail.connect.usq.edu.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <7a64sv$coo$1@news.wantree.com.au> <x9Hx2.1$PU1.1719@vic.nntp.telstra.net> <36C75C41.1498F43B@uq.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f70d1,ca27ed799978764e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf70d1,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,ca27ed799978764e
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public
X-Google-Thread: 111bbe,ca27ed799978764e
X-Google-Attributes: gid111bbe,public
From: * <q9421877@mail.connect.usq.edu.au>
Subject: Re: chances on NOT overclocking celeronA?
Date: 1999/02/18
Message-ID: <36CB5DF1.77E0EA6C@mail.connect.usq.edu.au>
X-Deja-AN: 445517259
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7a64sv$coo$1@news.wantree.com.au> <x9Hx2.1$PU1.1719@vic.nntp.telstra.net> <36C75C41.1498F43B@uq.net.au>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: Abuse@USQ.edu.au
X-Trace: usenet.usq.edu.au 919297544 12851 139.86.24.106 (18 Feb 1999 00:25:44 GMT)
Organization: University of Southern Queensland (Test)
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Feb 1999 00:25:44 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,aus.ads.forsale.computers,aus.computers