🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt
Article #352

Re: Experience with "cheaper" GeForce 2 video cards??

#352
From: curtis
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:41
30 lines
2749 bytes
There are big differences, plus now there are different types of GeForce
MX's.  Generally, the MX is quite crippled (which is the term used by pretty
much everyone to describe it).  But still it's cheap.  Another poster had
some descriptions, and also try the GideonTech.com site.

"Iain Miller" <DoNot@spam.me> wrote in message
news:9e9chl$f0n$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
"Barry Ward" <baz@powerup.com.au> wrote in message news:3b081efd@grissom...
> I have noticed a considerable difference in the price of GeForce 2 cards
> depending on manufacturer.  The well known brands are much more expensive
> than other "unknown" brands -- such as Apollo.
>
> Anybody have any experience in this area -- are all cards with the same
> chipset much the same .  I do realise that some cards have additional
> features .  I'm really only looking for a basic GeForce 2 based card to
play
> games with -- no need for TV out , DVD, etc.
>
> Barry

Only to be further complicated by the multiple variants....! (MX & GTS with
either 32 or 64Meg of RAM)

Havn't figured out the difference between MX & GTS yet myself....is it the
SDRAM vs DDR thing?

Anyone able to chip in & explain & also suggest how fast the various cards
are on a scale of 1-10 (and where would a GEForce 3 be in relation??)

I.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <tCYN6.19188$Ub.246016@news1.rdc1.ab.home.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.ab.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <3b081efd@grissom> <9e9chl$f0n$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d683,57b5ac834cba5211
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public
X-Google-Thread: f70d1,57b5ac834cba5211
X-Google-Attributes: gidf70d1,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,57b5ac834cba5211
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,57b5ac834cba5211
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a2ed,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-20 16:41:14 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.ab.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "curtis" <the.curtman@NOSPAMcanada.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,aus.computers,aus.computers.ibm-pc
References: <3b081efd@grissom> <9e9chl$f0n$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Experience with "cheaper" GeForce 2 video cards??
Lines: 34
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <tCYN6.19188$Ub.246016@news1.rdc1.ab.home.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:41:13 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.70.97.152
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news1.rdc1.ab.home.com 990402073 24.70.97.152 (Sun, 20 May 2001 16:41:13 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 16:41:13 PDT
Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster