Article View: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt
Article #376Re: Bad Pc133 RAM?
From: John
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 23:29
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 23:29
36 lines
2760 bytes
2760 bytes
Why is it not desirable to have more than one dimm of PC133? I am running 2 (256mb) ???? "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3a525eaf$1@news.iprimus.com.au... > > Barry Ward <baz@powerup.com.au> wrote > in message news:3a52273d@grissom... > > > I recently put together an AOPEN AX3S based system where > > I bought all the parts from a dealer in Brisbane. I also bought > > from him a stick of 128 Meg of Pc133 (Kingmax) memory. > > > The memory stick would not work - so I bought a cheaper > > 64 meg stick from another dealer and this worked fine. > > > Took the 128 meg stick back to the original dealer and got it > > replaced with 2x64 meg sticks --- BUT these will not work either. > > No matter whether I use them singly or in any combination > > ---only the 64 meg stick from the second dealer will work. > > > Now, am I missing something here -is it possible > > that 3 sticks from this dealer can be bad?? > > More like not bad, just not doing PC133 > properly if you are running them at 133MHz. > > Just force the original dealer to give your money back. > He legally has to do that when they clearly wont work > in that motherboard which obviously isnt defective when > the 64MB dimm from the other supplier works fine. > > Its not as desirable to have more than one dimm with PC133, > so you'd be better with a 128MB dimm that works than a pair > of 64MB dimms if you can find one that works in that motherboard. > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Nvt46.36195$1t.1905477@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!207.172.3.44!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!chnws02.mediaone.net!chnws05.ne.mediaone.net!24.128.8.202!typhoon.ne.mediaone.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<3a52273d@grissom> <3a525eaf$1@news.iprimus.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d683,16a6ca033992abf1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public X-Google-Thread: f70d1,16a6ca033992abf1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf70d1,public X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,16a6ca033992abf1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a2ed,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-02 15:30:05 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!207.172.3.44!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!chnws02.mediaone.net!chnws05.ne.mediaone.net!24.128.8.202!typhoon.ne.mediaone.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "John" <faclach@mediaone.net> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,aus.computers.ibm-pc References: <3a52273d@grissom> <3a525eaf$1@news.iprimus.com.au> Subject: Re: Bad Pc133 RAM? Lines: 38 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: <Nvt46.36195$1t.1905477@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 23:29:49 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.188.237 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net X-Trace: typhoon.ne.mediaone.net 978478189 66.30.188.237 (Tue, 02 Jan 2001 18:29:49 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 18:29:49 EST Organization: Road Runner