🚀 go-pugleaf

Guy Barwood - Dilithium Computing <dilithium@dilithium.com.au> wrote in
message news:4MU46.4940$l02.11018@news1.sunsh1.vic.optushome.com.au...
> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>> Guy Barwood - Dilithium Computing <dilithium@dilithium.com.au> wrote

>>> We do not have enough info to say for certain that the Kingmax RAM is faulty.

>> Duh.

> So how can he then (in your words)

>     "Just force the original dealer to give your money back.
>     He legally has to do that when they clearly wont work
>     in that motherboard which obviously isn't defective when
>     the 64MB dimm from the other supplier works fine."

> You have just indicated that quite obviously
> (read "Duh") the RAM is not necessarily faulty.

It isnt yet clear just whats going on on that stuff.

> Later

> PS It is as simple as I said in respect to the banks/sides,

Wrong.

> as number of devices determines the number of banks (max 9 devices per bank).

Wrong again. And there are plenty of chipsets that dont have a limit of 4 banks too.

> Aside:
> Quote from Intel (note I was wrong on board max which is actually 512Mb):
> System Memory
> The D815EEA desktop board supports up to 512 MB of dynamic memory. The three
> 168-pin Dual Inline Memory Module (DIMM) sockets support 3.3V unbuffered 100
> MHz, or 133 MHz, Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM) DIMMs. If
> PC133 memory is going to be run at the full 133 MHz, only four of the six
> DIMM sides can be used (two double-sided DIMMs, or one double-sided DIMM
> plus two single-sided DIMMs).
> http://developer.intel.com/design/motherbd/ea/ea_mem.htm for more info

All completely and utterly irrelevant, it aint his motherboard.