🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:01:57 GMT, Curious George
<cg@email.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 20:04:11 GMT, kony <spam@spam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 17:48:16 +1000, "Black Adder"
>><home@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Mate, your a dead-set idiot if you think 98 and 2000 are better than XP. 
>>>Windows XP has got more functionallity, better communications and runs 
>>>faster than those OS's.
>>
>>Thanks for trolling by.
>>If you can't run Win2k, it's your problem. The rest of the
>>world does so fine- in FACT, 2K is still the dominant
>>business OS, not XP.
>
>A couple months ago you were claiming most businesses run win98.
>That's a really fast migration ;)


WOW you really are sore about not being right all the time.
Did you REALLY want all your past posts recanted and argued
all over again?  Sure seems that way.  This is borderline
troll activity.

Note that I wrote most one time, dominant the other.  For
example, the pond is mostly small fish but the larger fish
are dominant.  

Even so, the last survey I had seen did put win98 boxes as
the majority.  I cannot assume Win2K becomes a majority
until a subsequent survey finds it to be the case.  I have
seen both used extensively but one thing is for certain,
that WinXP usage is still in the minority.  At least, it WAS
at that time, a level of support for 2K has now been dropped
and it is expected that will cause a few more businesses to
migrate to XP.  Will it then be a majority?  How long would
it take?  I won't guess but rather waiting for some evidence
of it.