Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #1165Re: Install win xp over a network
From: kony
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:58
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:58
43 lines
2742 bytes
2742 bytes
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:26:07 -0500, David Maynard <nospam@private.net> wrote: >kony wrote: > >> On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:29:15 GMT, Curious George >> <cg@email.net> wrote: >> >> >>>On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 23:14:05 -0500, David Maynard <nospam@private.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>> >>>>>I've never read anything concrete that explains just what is wrong >>>>>with netbuie >>>> >>>>You just listed one. It's non-routable. >>> >>>don't forget all the mindless network chatter. >> >> >> It has a smaller footprint on a network than TCPIP so it's a >> bit irrelevant. > >That is only true under limited circumstances Transferring data with it instead of TCPIP would be one of those, fairly popular circumstances. >... and if you've got internet >access you've got TCP/IP so regardless of how small the netbuei footprint >is it's still an additional footprint, not a 'reduction'. > No it is still a reduction to whatever extent you transfer data with it. Idle networks aren't a bandwidth problem, the focus needs be on transfers, their efficiency and duration. Of course there are far larger gains seen from things like moving from 10Mb to 100Mb, but there's not a lot of point in itemizing every possible network performance limiter when the topic was already isolating one parameter.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<u8i4f1h9hq073ufb3p1ud8ad009irc4d3b@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<da5i0p$jod$1@bagan.srce.hr> <42C69324.E7CE4F55@Guy.com> <11cdei2sde3uhf3@corp.supernews.com> <42C6C261.4C027A05@Guy.com> <11cepgdibul6iae@corp.supernews.com> <2p03f1ho73331t7i1a3quo29p0lorhkebf@4ax.com> <de63f1h0lbkhp5jqo7nk803k174qjofiu0@4ax.com> <11f3k9034f43da8@corp.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,ea7de1b713e27c5b X-Google-Thread: f70d1,ea7de1b713e27c5b X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,ea7de1b713e27c5b X-Google-Thread: 108c83,ea7de1b713e27c5b X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gidf70d1,gid10a2ed,gid108c83,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: kony <spam@spam.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,aus.computers,comp.hardware Subject: Re: Install win xp over a network Reply-To: spam@spam.com Message-ID: <u8i4f1h9hq073ufb3p1ud8ad009irc4d3b@4ax.com> References: <da5i0p$jod$1@bagan.srce.hr> <42C69324.E7CE4F55@Guy.com> <11cdei2sde3uhf3@corp.supernews.com> <42C6C261.4C027A05@Guy.com> <11cepgdibul6iae@corp.supernews.com> <2p03f1ho73331t7i1a3quo29p0lorhkebf@4ax.com> <de63f1h0lbkhp5jqo7nk803k174qjofiu0@4ax.com> <11f3k9034f43da8@corp.supernews.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 44 NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.203.138.253 X-Complaints-To: abuse@asp.att.net X-Trace: attbi_s21 1123174685 12.203.138.253 (Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:58:05 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:58:05 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:58:05 GMT