🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #1221

Re: Install win xp over a network

#1221
From: kony
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 04:43
33 lines
2572 bytes
On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 23:05:09 -0500, David Maynard
<nospam@private.net> wrote:


>> No, the problem is XP's networking.  If anything, antiquated
>> protocols have been around so long there is simply no excuse
>> for problems from the OS.  
>> 
>> MS does not "tell us" what to migrate away from.  When they
>> give me a free PC then they can dictate what it uses, not
>> when it's listed as a "supported" feature.
>
>That sounds so terribly 'consumer noble' but the fact of the matter is 
>there's no good reason to support an antiquated protocol.
>

Define support.

There is no good reason NOT to support it to the extent that
it works.  There is no good reason not to support ANY
protocol, even one completely home-grown, to the extend that
it installs in same manner and is supported though whatever
features it, itself, supports in a standardized manner.  

Perhaps it's only antiquated in your and MS's minds.
Certainly not so to anyone who uses it.  That doesn't even
begin to mean someone else shouldn't use something that
suits their needs more than your own personal alternative
would.

The fact of the matter is that the main benefit of TCP/IP is
that it's routable..  Once you remove that need, you're left
with a slower protocol.  
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4crec15k5j63euhgt75i4git3605r5a26v@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <da5i0p$jod$1@bagan.srce.hr> <42C69324.E7CE4F55@Guy.com> <11cdei2sde3uhf3@corp.supernews.com> <stkdc19egceetqcmeipbslcsg5ssn2q7a9@4ax.com> <11ceovm1q8rbafc@corp.supernews.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,ea7de1b713e27c5b
X-Google-Thread: f70d1,ea7de1b713e27c5b
X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,ea7de1b713e27c5b
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,ea7de1b713e27c5b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gidf70d1,gid10a2ed,gid108c83,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: kony <spam@spam.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,aus.computers,comp.hardware
Subject: Re: Install  win xp over a network
Reply-To: spam@spam.com
Message-ID: <4crec15k5j63euhgt75i4git3605r5a26v@4ax.com>
References: <da5i0p$jod$1@bagan.srce.hr> <42C69324.E7CE4F55@Guy.com> <11cdei2sde3uhf3@corp.supernews.com> <stkdc19egceetqcmeipbslcsg5ssn2q7a9@4ax.com> <11ceovm1q8rbafc@corp.supernews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.203.138.253
X-Complaints-To: abuse@asp.att.net
X-Trace: attbi_s21 1120365820 12.203.138.253 (Sun, 03 Jul 2005 04:43:40 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 04:43:40 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 04:43:40 GMT