Re: Trying to understand dual core processors

Article View: alt.comp.hardware

Article #123

#123

From: El.Plates
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:45

47 lines
3649 bytes


"sandy58" <aleckie68@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
news:22ee4793-92d0-46d3-894a-f724f1030398@u1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 7, 12:33 pm, "Band" <inva...@witheld.invalid> wrote:
>> "muzician21" <muzicia...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:2b848985-e443-4f11-ae06-b40d51ce5419@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > Trying to understand the breakdown of things as far as dual core
>> > systems. Things got a little murky for me since it isn't simply
>> > Pentium -whatever- and an ever higher gig number.
>>
>> > I've got a 2.4 gig P4. How does that compare both to early dual cores
>> > and to whatever the current fastest processors are?
>>
>> > Is there good a site that shows the breakdown of things as far as the
>> > history of processors to present day?
>>
>> > Thanks
>>
>> Sigh, you're a google grouper who typically doesn't know
>> how to use google.
>>
>> Do a search with these terms:
>> Multi Core
>> dual core vs quad core
>> dual core, gaming
>>
>> Then there is the issues of compatibility - appropriate slot!
>> Cooling, overclocking. Etc
>> Do your own searching.
>
> "Sigh, you're a google grouper who typically doesn't know
> how to use google."
> Favourite expression of yours, "strange person".
> It's maybe just as well you change your name so often, shit-for-
> brainz.
> That Troll & UnWise One, Ronnie Kray, Nancy, Ken.......is Barbie Next?
> Do you have a "gender" problem? Like it's "that day of the month"? Hit
> out at all "definite" males/females? Jealous? What a prick(less?) cunt
> you are. I haven't yet seen ONE helpful suggestion issued from your
> gaping shit-hole you use as a mouth. "Talking shit" takes on a whole
> new concept after your crap. Don't be a total arsehole ALL your life.
> Have a day off. :-)

How's sandy58 today :-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <gou8bf$4g6$1@news.motzarella.org>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.erje.net!news.motzarella.org!motzarella.org!news.motzarella.org!not-for-mail

References:

<2b848985-e443-4f11-ae06-b40d51ce5419@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <0tSdneWToLM19C_UnZ2dnUVZ8uGdnZ2d@bt.com> <22ee4793-92d0-46d3-894a-f724f1030398@u1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f5f89,b204b4f592cda47
X-Google-Thread: faa3c,b204b4f592cda47
X-Google-Thread: fe5ee,b204b4f592cda47
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gidfaa3c,gidfe5ee,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.erje.net!news.motzarella.org!motzarella.org!news.motzarella.org!not-for-mail
From: "El.Plates" <pints@thebar.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.windows-xp
Subject: Re: Trying to understand dual core processors
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 16:45:26 -0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <gou8bf$4g6$1@news.motzarella.org>
References: <2b848985-e443-4f11-ae06-b40d51ce5419@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <0tSdneWToLM19C_UnZ2dnUVZ8uGdnZ2d@bt.com> <22ee4793-92d0-46d3-894a-f724f1030398@u1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 format=flowed;
 charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.eternal-september.org U2FsdGVkX1+LyxC8rKgfhKqRe9qn4cIw4TZJckmv9Zd35g9KymTUgga2f9jtm7vlSR+L/HMWCXMxrPUbtOmWEpkoQ1hbptq4mziXF3MlekQEqnKq7Hg+hGIru/aH/C+prlRfDgMUWfg=
X-Complaints-To: Please send complaints to abuse@motzarella.org with full headers
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 16:45:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8050.1202
In-Reply-To: <22ee4793-92d0-46d3-894a-f724f1030398@u1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8050.1202
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+cNcH0+BT3HCLja4J43ypDB5Dt5RQIzaEXcCGUxT82nQ==
Importance: Normal
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AK+bT5dd7uONThe+XqE2NdLoOt0=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

Reply to Parent Message