Re: Diffence between these HP scanners.

Article View: alt.comp.hardware

Article #1337

#1337

From: Mick
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:20

26 lines
2104 bytes

the 5300 is either usb or parallel where as the 6300 is most likely SCSI with USB -
(maybe).
I don't know what the optical dpi is between them.  But I would expect all the 6xxx series
to be the same and the 5xxx series to be less.
Have a look at the HP web site and see if there is any info there for you.

Mick

D wrote:
> 
> Hi All
> I am just wondering what the difference is between the following HP
> scanners:
> The old HP ScanJet 6200C and the new HP ScanJet 6300C?  Is it just the
> additional quick scan buttons on the front.  Does the newer one make
> scanning any easier?
> 
> Also what is the difference between the 5300C and the 6300C, is it just the
> additional software you get with it?
> 
> Also anyone's comments on to whether they are good or bad scanners.  I can
> get a 2nd hand 6200C for $200AUD or a 6300C for $300AUD, and just wondering
> what the better buy is.
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> Darren Gardner

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3A95BAE4.97F41D5B@work.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!enews.sgi.com!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!news.itmel.bhp.com.au!not-for-mail

References: <1mfl6.2409$tu1.171465@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,98d1d5aa55236ac3
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,98d1d5aa55236ac3
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-22 17:22:09 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!enews.sgi.com!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!news.itmel.bhp.com.au!not-for-mail
From: Mick <stuck@work.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,aus.computers
Subject: Re: Diffence between these HP scanners.
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:20:36 +1100
Organization: BHP Company Ltd
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <3A95BAE4.97F41D5B@work.com>
References: <1mfl6.2409$tu1.171465@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.7.73.203
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: gossamer.itmel.bhp.com.au 982891238 4925 203.7.73.203 (23 Feb 2001 01:20:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itmel.bhp.com.au
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Feb 2001 01:20:38 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en

Reply to Parent Message