Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #166Re: Utility to obtain CPU temperature
From: kony
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:58
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:58
27 lines
3027 bytes
3027 bytes
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:20:01 -0000, "Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote: >"kony" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message >news:517jr3hhdpqaivlp9es5dl8189augktuku@4ax.com... >> >> Currently Intel has a lead in the upper end, before that AMD >> did, then Intel. Lather, rinse, repeat. > >Remind me when AMD had a clear lead, apart from when the Athlon64 was faster >and more efficient than the P4? Not saying that you are wrong, but I do not >know of any other times. Maybe you are talking from price/performance >perspective on K6 vs PIII? Surely the Coppermine and Tualatin PIIIs were >better CPUs though.. > >ss. > K6-III was faster excluding floating point, as was early Athlon when considering price (always relevant since barely anybody buys the high end. I also preferred Coppermine and Tualatin Celeron & P3 but not for the obvious reasons, rather than they had more overclocking margin and on average, superior chipsets for their motherboards. Seems most of the industry outside of server integrators ignored Tualatins though, they were all caught up in the underwhelming P4 when it first came out.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ahgmr3d62fq9j3g0knjo4ln9hhclu5613f@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.insightbb.com!news.insightbb.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<83fbd430-c765-4ca2-b707-b0b5ed0e62a1@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <gV6uj.58853$FA.5994@pd7urf2no> <Ro6dnY_sbaQXpyTanZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com> <evfuj.52358$Ly.50040@pd7urf1no> <517jr3hhdpqaivlp9es5dl8189augktuku@4ax.com> <iICdnTM-CoJ8tibanZ2dnUVZ8tChnZ2d@bt.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,5f69ec82c63b0ff7 X-Google-Thread: 1063f0,5f69ec82c63b0ff7 X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,5f69ec82c63b0ff7 X-Google-Thread: faa3c,5f69ec82c63b0ff7 X-Google-Thread: 112049,5f69ec82c63b0ff7 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gid1063f0,gid10a2ed,gidfaa3c,gid112049,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.insightbb.com!news.insightbb.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:55:24 -0600 From: kony <spam@spam.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,uk.comp.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.freeware Subject: Re: Utility to obtain CPU temperature Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:58:48 -0500 Reply-To: spam@spam.com Message-ID: <ahgmr3d62fq9j3g0knjo4ln9hhclu5613f@4ax.com> References: <83fbd430-c765-4ca2-b707-b0b5ed0e62a1@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <gV6uj.58853$FA.5994@pd7urf2no> <Ro6dnY_sbaQXpyTanZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com> <evfuj.52358$Ly.50040@pd7urf1no> <517jr3hhdpqaivlp9es5dl8189augktuku@4ax.com> <iICdnTM-CoJ8tibanZ2dnUVZ8tChnZ2d@bt.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.129.163.181 X-Trace: sv3-hnl0d7A0FBribeic2M3DdILYbTQtS1DzBEtDHns0xConewfKvejSXIdthO/Td9A8sBzogGpyDEF8rCp!+TXNrAL4uez8Je6dLbdSZqLyPRS7jILTzbE4ysr74QkXu+xIsVlQIca59SbFNMiBO0hElYegh4w8!hBjiMkDw1AsJuQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@insightbb.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@insightbb.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.37