Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #23SSD --- The reliability of
From: Penang
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:30
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:30
9 lines
1609 bytes
1609 bytes
Please pardon me if this topic has been discussed before, but as far as I know about the Flash memory, they have a relatively low limit on re-write, as compared to hard disk In situation where database use in concern, read and write operation takes place very often I know that there are pros and cons in this issue, but basically my question is this --- How reliable is SSD?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<18466f6d-fc6f-4b26-a73a-bb27fc9e697c@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: b1cbc11f53,d271ff33e869b9ea,start X-Google-Attributes: gidb1cbc11f53,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Penang <kalambong@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,24hoursupport.helpdesk,comp.databases.informix Subject: SSD --- The reliability of Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 9 Message-ID: <18466f6d-fc6f-4b26-a73a-bb27fc9e697c@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 115.133.204.220 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1250058635 8285 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2009 06:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=115.133.204.220; posting-account=mTVYigoAAAA3-ZAbltcwsPOgubUI2xn8 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.13) Gecko/2009073022 Firefox/3.0.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)