Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #233Re: Increasing the speed of dial-up to that of cable -- possible?
From: kony
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:15
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:15
68 lines
4728 bytes
4728 bytes
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:16:33 -0700, "nobody >" <invalid@email.death.by.spam> wrote: >kony wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:33:12 -0000, Radium >> <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> My question was can Quadrature Modulation and Constellation Modulation >>> allow analog dial-up modems to have the same speed as cable modems? >>> Not any kind of DSL, just analog. >>> >>> Can the analog phone line make use of the above two modulations >>> schemes to achieve cable-modem speeds at the voiceband frequencies >>> used by the analog dial-up modem? >> >> The answer is no, it can't. Plain old twisted pair bell >> wire cannot retain the analog signal at the sufficiently >> high frequencies necessary to come anywhere near ISDN, ADSL, >> let alone *cable* broadband speeds. > >That's funny.. I'd swear that it's plain old twisted pair bell wire that >runs about 6,500 feet from the remote DSLAM to my house. Reread what I wrote. _Analog_ signal. I think we're all well aware that ADSL uses telephone wire, and we're also aware it can't meet cable broadband speed which was one of the stipulations. >I wonder why >I'm getting 2900/670 down/up. Must be that fancy CAT5 cable that runs >between my computer and the modem that does it. (I always use an >external modem) > >Reality is that you can push Gigabit down a two-strand barbed-wire fence >if you have the bucks to spend on the equipment at the ends. A nice idea but no, you can't. The SNR drops so low there would be insufficient differentiation to reach high speeds, no matter how good the equipment. Maybe if you meant a few inches of wire instead of a telephone line length run, but I don't see many people stringing only a few inches of barbed wire as it wouldn't make for much of a "fence". I don't ask you to agree though, show anyone doing it, pushing a cable broadband speed signal reliably down a steel barbed wire run long enough to connect your modem to a DSLAM. Considering even your TP copper wire can't, unless a device is specifically made to do this you have no reasonable expectation it can be done, nor that anyone would ever even try to create such a device for "barbed wire broadband". > >> >> If you had bothered to do some research you would know this. >> >> I recommmend you do some basic, prerequisite learning of >> basic core technologies before trying to bite off more than >> you can chew. The building blocks of education are not >> trying to invent some new thing when you don't even know how >> the old things worked. > >If you are trying to smarten up poor Radium, you'd better take your own >advice. Start by reading more carefully. People don't generally write things without reason (except of course Radium).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<cru4c35hhtflcfthl6fcask1v4n2lc5ae0@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.insightbb.com!news.insightbb.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<1187045374.227004.161110@g12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <o7OdnfWy36_zel3bnZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com> <1187047674.362936.294950@g12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <1187047992.660981.318810@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <a302c3td4nltuf40m0ki8idfhdph06t08o@4ax.com> <f9tr6h02rjc@news2.newsguy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,b5b6cdc0ee657d29 X-Google-Thread: 10beba,b5b6cdc0ee657d29 X-Google-Thread: 108b8a,b5b6cdc0ee657d29 X-Google-Thread: faa3c,b5b6cdc0ee657d29 X-Google-Thread: 10e11e,b5b6cdc0ee657d29 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gid10beba,gid108b8a,gidfaa3c,gid10e11e,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.insightbb.com!news.insightbb.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:13:55 -0500 From: kony <spam@spam.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,comp.dcom.modems,microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web,24hoursupport.helpdesk,microsoft.public.win2000.networking Subject: Re: Increasing the speed of dial-up to that of cable -- possible? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:15:12 -0400 Reply-To: spam@spam.com Message-ID: <cru4c35hhtflcfthl6fcask1v4n2lc5ae0@4ax.com> References: <1187045374.227004.161110@g12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <o7OdnfWy36_zel3bnZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com> <1187047674.362936.294950@g12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <1187047992.660981.318810@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <a302c3td4nltuf40m0ki8idfhdph06t08o@4ax.com> <f9tr6h02rjc@news2.newsguy.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 69 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.129.163.181 X-Trace: sv3-44jf6MTuogZlyLgWpyBsFL+6s+pzyiiHGjrr5eKRSp/cGo8w4SzhhL3Jt7QRf0U9YRQBUSk4rnaBrqH!zf56+WV2rt7cdrd+XXQBnhXIGLHTy7VjCIluw3T1+SiKVlUvmjYTF4Y3haD+yGRjZ2iSwHjYMw70!ySzeiz7xIROIVQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@insightbb.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@insightbb.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.35