🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #2483

Re: AIX versus SUN and Linux, best price performance ?

#2483
From: Arl� Mooldijk
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 18:50
33 lines
2518 bytes
"Louis" <nospam@nospam.nl> wrote in message
news:3ee728e8$0$49103$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...

> We have a IBM RS6000 F50 running AIX 4.3.3 with 3 CPU's and 9 mirrored
disks
> and 1.5 GB internal memory. DBMS Basis 9.1 runs on it. This database can
be
> compared with Oracle regarding performance. However it's not
> multi-threading.
>
> We are thinking of upgrading hardware. The F50 cannot handle the job
> anymore. The Basis DBMS runs on AIX, Linux and SUN. Our database will be
> around 60 GB and should be spreaded on multiple disks (at least 4). In
total
> we need at least 10 disks (20-40 GB). We need 2-4 GB memory.

Why do you need at least 10 disks? Disks have more storage space these
days...

> The solution should be cheap but also reliable. So, we prefer cheap memory
> and cheap (instead of expensive IBM SSA disks) SCSI or even IDE disks.

Linux is cheap. If it is a serious server then I'd recommend SCSI with a
RAID5 controller for the database storage and a mirrored disk for OS. This
means about 5 disks minimum (3 for RAID5 and 2 for OS). HotSwap if desirable
(but very nice and handy when you can afford it; saves you downtime when a
disk fails). HP/Compaq is a good choice for Intel based servers. The support
of HP is very good (personal experience).

Just my opinion though...

With Kind Regards,
Arl�
Technical Details
Message-ID: <vehiruqfbif0d3@corp.supernews.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
References: <3ee728e8$0$49103$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,9d0eca3b8d69ff30
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,9d0eca3b8d69ff30
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,public
X-Google-Thread: 1151bb,9ce9a6e8e3a3917b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1151bb,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a000,9ce9a6e8e3a3917b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a000,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-12 11:50:39 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Arl� Mooldijk" <reply@to.newsgroup.please>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,comp.os.linux.hardware,demon.nl.hardware,nl.comp.hardware
Subject: Re: AIX versus SUN and Linux, best price performance ?
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:50:39 +0200
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <vehiruqfbif0d3@corp.supernews.com>
References: <3ee728e8$0$49103$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4922.1500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 35