Re: What percentage must be alloted to primary partition.

Article View: alt.comp.hardware

Article #260

#260

From: joshidm
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:54

16 lines
2386 bytes

On 14 May, 17:41, "GT" <ContactGT_remo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a drive size limit with that version of windows. I can't comment
> on Win2000, but the 2 sizes you quote there add up to 127gB, so probably a
> software issue regarding accessing drivers over that size. You should be
> able to use the rest of the drive when you do the disk management in WinXP
> and possible even use a utility to resize the 108gBpartition.

I do uncomplicated things on machines which are used remotely by
people devising applications.

On face of it loss of space amounts to twice what I thought.

20gb partition has OS on it and I doubt if remote operators would try
to do anything on 108gb partition.

Machine has second 500gb disk showing regular 465gb space.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1179215645.458783.164770@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1178866976.382920.230470@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <46443199$0$30277$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <1179129854.994243.144130@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <46482224$0$7639$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <1179152628.409926.12200@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <464890d4$0$30951$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f5f89,e416c8788cb74e5b
X-Google-Thread: faa3c,e416c8788cb74e5b
X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,e416c8788cb74e5b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gidfaa3c,gid10a2ed,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: joshidm@gmail.com
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: Re: What percentage must be alloted to primary partition.
Date: 15 May 2007 00:54:05 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <1179215645.458783.164770@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <1178866976.382920.230470@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <46443199$0$30277$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
   <1179129854.994243.144130@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <46482224$0$7639$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
   <1179152628.409926.12200@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <464890d4$0$30951$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.97.139.72
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1179215649 12509 127.0.0.1 (15 May 2007 07:54:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:54:09 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <464890d4$0$30951$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.97.139.72;
   posting-account=1sb-BQwAAADusi45DXNYNuWogX-1SSQ3

Reply to Parent Message