Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #263Re: What percentage must be alloted to primary partition.
From: joshidm
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:04
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:04
48 lines
3578 bytes
3578 bytes
On 11 May, 10:05, "GT" <ContactGT_remo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Was patitioning 160gbmaxtordisk throughmaxtorutility. NTFS > > formating was getting allowed only when dial reached 34gb mark. > > > Then same size disk was partitioned with size of primary set at 20gb > > while installing OS. > > > But in the second instance lost something like 10gb disk space. > > > So wonder if for NTFS format of primarypartitiona certain percetage > > of total size must be alloted in order not to lose any space on the > > disk. > > I don't exactly follow what you are saying here. An NTFSpartitioncan be > any size (max = 2^64 = about 18.5 Million TeraBytes). Perhaps themaxtor > utility has a false minimum limit. What does it suggest to use for 33GB as > Fat32 is (falsly by windows) limited to 32GB, so if NTFS isn't allowed until > you reach 34GB, then 33GB is in "no man's land"! Untill over 33gb is reached the dial does stays in FAT32 zone only after that it allows NTFS option. I am sorry that I could not come back to my queryy earlier. > The reason you are 'losing' over 10GB is this: > > There is a problem with the term GB - it can be interpreted in 2 ways by > people with different backgrounds/outlooks. Some follow the mathematical > definition that Giga means 10^9 (1,000,000,000) and others follow the other > meaning (not sure what the dicipline is called) of Giga which is 2^30 > (1073741824). This second term is sometimes refered to as Gibi (GIga in > BInary). > > The marketing people atmaxtor(and other drives), use the mathematical > definition to describe their drive capacities. So your 160GB drive holds > 160,000,000,000 Bytes (mathematically accurate). Windows reports drive sizes > using the other definition, so to windows your drive holds 160 / 2^30 = > 149GB. > > Strange but true - the only industry or dicipline in the world where 160GB = > 149GB! But this is probably where you are 'losing' over 10GB of space. The > answer is that you aren't losing the space, its just windows reporting the > size wrongly. On the disk that was partitioned through maxtor utility sizes showing are 32.8gb vs 116gb
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1179129854.994243.144130@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1178866976.382920.230470@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <46443199$0$30277$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,e416c8788cb74e5b X-Google-Thread: faa3c,e416c8788cb74e5b X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,e416c8788cb74e5b X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gidfaa3c,gid10a2ed,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: joshidm@gmail.com Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt Subject: Re: What percentage must be alloted to primary partition. Date: 14 May 2007 01:04:15 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 49 Message-ID: <1179129854.994243.144130@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> References: <1178866976.382920.230470@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <46443199$0$30277$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.97.139.72 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1179129855 30594 127.0.0.1 (14 May 2007 08:04:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:04:15 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <46443199$0$30277$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.97.139.72; posting-account=1sb-BQwAAADusi45DXNYNuWogX-1SSQ3