🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #296

Re: Dial-up Modem Speed of 56 Mbps? - Can't believe anyone took this seriously...

#296
From: Floyd L. Davidson
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:26
31 lines
2951 bytes
"Noozer" <dont.spam@me.here> wrote:
>
>... and there is one other item to take into consideration here. A 56kbit
>modem will ONLY run faster than 33.6kbit if the answering end of the system
>is digital. It can't be an analog phone line, etc. This means you'll never
>get 56kbit dialing between PC modems.

What is required is that there be only one codec in the
connection.  It makes no difference which side answers and which
side originates.

However, your conclusion that 56Kbps cannot happen "dialing
between PC modems" is correct, because there is necessarily a
requirement for two codecs if each "PC modem" is a modem
connected to a POTS telephone line.  That is a function of the
POTS lines, not of a "PC modem", unless of course you define it
to be a modem that only uses a POTS line, as opposed, for
example, to being an ISDN modem).  That's obviously a lot of
hair splitting... :-)

The "analog phone line" is not actually used as an analog phone
line when there is only one codec.  Instead the codec becomes a
digitial level shifting mechanism (which converts digital PCM to
digital PAM, and there is nothing analog about the data!  If it
is, however, decoded by a 2nd codec...  it becomes a
"quasi-analog" signal, and can no longer be used in any way that
will produce a bit rate approaching 56Kbps.

-- 
Floyd L. Davidson            <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)                         floyd@apaflo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <87vefk87t6.fld@barrow.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
References: <1177378238.361891.73650@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <Xns991C97AB1B12thanexit@66.250.146.158> <mVkXh.121595$DE1.37097@pd7urf2no> <1177430988.571457.266060@u32g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <462E51B4.C1DDE988@yahoo.com> <Xns991CA2F8F87Athanexit@66.250.146.158> <462E8321.182A78CC@yahoo.com> <Xns991CEB71086B0thanexit@66.250.146.158> <E5PXh.126796$DE1.126581@pd7urf2no>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Thread: 10beba,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Thread: 108b8a,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Thread: faa3c,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Thread: 10e11e,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gid10beba,gid108b8a,gidfaa3c,gid10e11e,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,comp.dcom.modems,microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web,24hoursupport.helpdesk,microsoft.public.win2000.networking
Subject: Re: Dial-up Modem Speed of 56 Mbps? - Can't believe anyone took
 this   seriously...
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:26:13 -0800
Organization: __________
Message-ID: <87vefk87t6.fld@barrow.com>
References: <1177378238.361891.73650@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <Xns991C97AB1B12thanexit@66.250.146.158>
 <mVkXh.121595$DE1.37097@pd7urf2no>
 <1177430988.571457.266060@u32g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <462E51B4.C1DDE988@yahoo.com> <Xns991CA2F8F87Athanexit@66.250.146.158>
 <462E8321.182A78CC@yahoo.com> <Xns991CEB71086B0thanexit@66.250.146.158>
 <E5PXh.126796$DE1.126581@pd7urf2no>
User-Agent: gnus 5.10.6/XEmacs 21.4.15/Linux 2.6.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4nBvXmCpNYOhfOi1/R3cxsiAhRo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 31