🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #308

Re: Dial-up Modem Speed of 56 Mbps? - Can't believe anyone took this seriously...

#308
From: Radium
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:32
15 lines
2353 bytes
On Apr 24, 3:24 am, "Noozer" <dont.s...@me.here> wrote:

> ...and 56k modems were regulated to 53k. Also, There is no easy way to
> amalgamate all the connections into a single stream. Just put two 100mbit
> network cards in a PC. It won't let you download at 200mbit. It will let you
> have two 100mbit streams though.

http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/2427/clocksignalexample8is.gif

If each clock signal is 1 GHz, and you have a 4 of them, staggered
such that every 1ns part of the CPU can start, and finish, an
instruction - making the effective 'clock rate' 4 GHz.

I wondering if something analogous could be done with dial-up modems.
IOW, using more phone lines/modems/phone #'s to get a faster speed.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1177464749.164040.55720@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1177378238.361891.73650@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <Xns991C97AB1B12thanexit@66.250.146.158> <mVkXh.121595$DE1.37097@pd7urf2no>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Thread: 10beba,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Thread: 108b8a,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Thread: faa3c,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Thread: 10e11e,aa6fae6c35701086
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gid10beba,gid108b8a,gidfaa3c,gid10e11e,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,comp.dcom.modems,microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web,24hoursupport.helpdesk,microsoft.public.win2000.networking
Subject: Re: Dial-up Modem Speed of 56 Mbps? - Can't believe anyone took this seriously...
Date: 24 Apr 2007 18:32:29 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <1177464749.164040.55720@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
References: <1177378238.361891.73650@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
   <Xns991C97AB1B12thanexit@66.250.146.158>
   <mVkXh.121595$DE1.37097@pd7urf2no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.84.17.48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1177464759 30795 127.0.0.1 (25 Apr 2007 01:32:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:32:39 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <mVkXh.121595$DE1.37097@pd7urf2no>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.84.17.48;
   posting-account=lXUL4Q0AAAA2JxMmVRdUd7bMtBM7ensS